Strings in Java vs Strings in C++: Key Differences Explained

A string is simply a sequence of characters (like words or sentences). Both Java and C++ let you work with text, but they handle strings in different ways. In Java, strings are objects of the java.lang.String class with many built-in methods. 

In C++, you have two main choices: traditional C-style character arrays or the modern std::string class from the standard library. This guide explains these differences with clear examples and practical tips. 

You can also explore our in-depth Software engineering courses.

Strings in Java

In Java, a string literal (text in quotes) automatically creates a String object. For example:

String greeting = "Hello";
System.out.println(greeting);

Output:

Hello

Here, greeting refers to a String object holding "Hello". Java String objects are immutable – their contents cannot be changed once created. If you try to modify a string, Java actually makes a new object. For example:

String s = "abc";
s = s.toUpperCase();  // returns "ABC"

After this, s refers to a new string "ABC", and the original "abc" remains unchanged. Java also uses a string pool in memory to save space. Identical string literals share the same object. For instance:

String a = "cat";
String b = "cat";

Here both a and b point to the same string object in the pool.

Java provides many useful methods of Strings (length(), substring(), equals(), etc.) and supports the + operator for concatenation. Under the hood, + uses a StringBuilder for efficiency. For example:

String name = "Anika";
String message = "Hello, " + name + "!";
System.out.println(message);

Output:

Hello, Anika!

Stay ahead with these handpicked, high-impact courses.

• upGrad’s AI-Powered Full Stack Development Course by IIITB 
• upGrad’s Professional Certificate Program in Cloud Computing and DevOps 
• upGrad’s Master of Design in User Experience  

Strings in C++

C++ offers two main approaches:

C-Style Character Arrays

This is the classic C approach. A string is a char array ending with a null character '\0'. For example:

char greeting[] = "Hello";
std::cout << greeting << std::endl;

Output:

Hello

Under the hood, greeting is a 6-element array: {'H','e','l','l','o','\0'}. The '\0' marks the end of the string. You must ensure the array is large enough for all characters plus the null terminator. C-style strings are mutable (you can change individual characters) but their size is fixed at compile time.

Also read: Substrings in C++: Complete Guide & Examples

std::string (C++ String Class)

This is a C++ class for dynamic strings. It automatically manages memory and can grow or shrink. For example:

#include <iostream>
#include <string>
int main() {
    std::string greeting = "Hello";
    std::string name = "Bunny";
    std::string message = greeting + ", " + name + "!";
    std::cout << message << std::endl;
    return 0;
}

Output:

Hello, Bunny!

std::string objects are mutable (you can modify them). They offer many methods like length(), substr(), append(), etc. A std::string handles its own memory internally, so you don’t have to allocate a buffer yourself.

Key Differences

• Type: Java String is a built-in class. C++ has both a string class (std::string) and plain C-style char[] strings.
• Mutability: Java strings are immutable (once created they can’t change). C++ std::string objects are mutable(you can modify them). (A char[] array in C++ is also mutable but fixed-size.)
• Memory: Java stores string literals in a special string pool on the heap, allowing reuse of identical values. C++ std::string uses dynamic heap memory and can resize itself; C-style char[] has a fixed size.
• Syntax: Java uses quotes for String literals (e.g. String s = "hi";). In C++, you write std::string s = "hi"; for a string object, or char s[] = "hi"; for a C-style string.
• Operations: Java strings have many built-in methods and support + concatenation. C-style strings use functions like strlen, strcpy, strcat. std::string supports +, .append(), .length(), etc.
• Performance: Because Java strings are immutable, using many concatenations in a loop can be slow, so using StringBuilder is recommended. In C++, std::string may reallocate as it grows; calling reserve() can optimize performance.

How Strings Handle Memory in Both Languages

In Java, string literals (e.g. "hello") are stored in a special constant pool in the heap. For example,

String a = "hello";
String b = "hello";

makes both a and b refer to the same object in the pool. Using new String("hello") still uses the pool for characters but creates a separate object on the heap. Java’s garbage collector automatically frees String objects that are no longer used.

In C++, memory use depends on the type. A char[] is allocated with a fixed size (often on the stack). Exceeding that size causes errors. In contrast, std::string allocates on the heap and grows as needed. When a std::string grows beyond its capacity, it allocates a new, larger block of memory and copies the contents. The old block is then freed. This means you don’t need to manage memory yourself when using std::string.

Real-World Use Cases

• User Input: Reading names or messages.

Java example:String user = "Anika";
System.out.println("Hello, " + user + "!");

Output:

Hello, Anika!

C++ example:std::string user = "Bunny";
std::cout << "Hello, " << user << "!" << std::endl;

Output: 

Hello, Bunny!

• Data Processing: Parsing or splitting text, such as CSV or log files. Java might use str.split(","); C++ can use string streams or std::string methods.
• Building Messages: Concatenating text for output or logs. Java often uses StringBuilder to join pieces, while C++ can use std::ostringstream or simply append to a std::string.
• File I/O: Storing file paths or reading text from files. Java’s file readers produce String objects; in C++, file streams can read data into std::string.
• Networking/Web: Handling protocol messages or JSON data. Both languages use strings to compose or parse textual data for network requests or JSON content.

Best Practices for Using Strings in Projects

• Prefer std::string over C-style strings in C++ unless you must interface with old C code. std::string manages its own memory and avoids buffer overflows.
• Use StringBuilder for concatenation in Java when combining many strings. It’s more efficient than repeatedly using String with +.
• Compare strings correctly: In Java, use s1.equals(s2) (not ==) to compare contents. In C++, you can use == on std::string or use functions like strcmp for C-strings.
• Reserve capacity: In C++, if you know a string will grow to a certain size, call s.reserve(size) to allocate memory upfront and avoid repeated reallocations. In Java, reuse a single StringBuilder rather than creating many small String objects in a loop.
• Avoid unnecessary copies: Don’t write new String(oldString) in Java; it creates a duplicate. Instead reuse existing strings or literals.
• Mind character encoding: Java String uses UTF-16. In C++, std::string is a sequence of char (often UTF-8 or ASCII). For full Unicode support in C++, consider std::u16string or a Unicode library.
• Handle null-termination (C++): Always end char[] strings with '\0'. Functions like std::getline() (which reads into std::string) can help avoid manual null-termination.

Conclusion

• Types: Java String is an object; C++ offers std::string and C-style char[].
• Mutability: Java strings are immutable (cannot be changed) while C++ std::string objects are mutable.
• Memory: Java stores literals in a string pool. C++ std::string grows dynamically (reallocating as needed), whereas C-style arrays have fixed size.
• Best Practices: Use StringBuilder in Java for repeated concatenationand prefer std::string over raw char[] in C++.

Understanding these differences helps you write clearer, more efficient code when working with text in either language.

FAQs

1. Why are Java Strings immutable while C++ strings are mutable?

Java Strings are immutable for security, thread safety, and memory efficiency. Once created, they can't change. In contrast, C++ std::string is mutable to give more control over memory and performance, letting developers modify string content directly without creating new objects each time.

2. Which is more memory-efficient: Java String or C++ std::string?

C++ std::string is generally more memory-efficient because it avoids the overhead of Java’s object model and garbage collector. However, Java’s string pool reuses literals to save memory. The efficiency depends on how strings are used and managed in each language.

3. Can you resize a string after it's created in Java and C++?

In Java, you can't resize a String since it’s immutable. You’d need to use StringBuilder for that. In C++, std::string supports dynamic resizing with methods like .resize() or .append(), making it flexible for modifying or extending content on the fly.

4. How do Java and C++ handle string concatenation differently?

Java uses the + operator for String concatenation, which internally uses StringBuilder. C++ allows + with std::string, which performs direct memory appends. However, for efficiency in loops, Java prefers StringBuilder, while C++ can use .append() or ostringstream.

5. Are string comparisons the same in Java and C++?

No. In Java, use .equals() to compare string content and == for reference comparison. In C++, use == with std::string, but for C-style char[], use strcmp() as == compares memory addresses, not the actual character data.

6. Is it safe to use C-style strings in modern C++?

It’s not recommended unless required for backward compatibility with legacy C code. C-style strings are prone to buffer overflows and require manual memory management. Prefer std::string in modern C++ for safety, easier syntax, and automatic memory handling.

7. How do Java and C++ handle string encoding?

Java String uses UTF-16 encoding by default. C++ std::string is encoding-agnostic and typically holds ASCII or UTF-8 data. For proper Unicode support in C++, developers often use libraries like ICU or switch to std::wstring or std::u16string.

8. Which language handles large-scale string operations better?

C++ offers more control over memory and may perform better in raw speed with large strings, especially using std::string::reserve(). However, Java provides built-in memory management and tools like StringBuilder, which make large operations easier to implement and safer.

9. Can strings be null in Java and C++?

Yes, but with differences. In Java, a String can be null, causing a NullPointerException if accessed. In C++, a std::string object is never null once initialized, but pointers to strings (char*) can be null and must be checked carefully.

10. How is string memory released in Java vs C++?

Java uses automatic garbage collection to clean up unused String objects. In C++, memory for std::string is released automatically when the object goes out of scope. For char* or manually allocated memory, you must use delete or free explicitly.

11. Can Java strings be modified using indexing like C++ strings?

No. Java String is immutable, so you can’t modify it using indexing. You can read characters using charAt(), but for modifications, you must use StringBuilder. In C++, std::string allows direct character modification using indexing, like s[0] = 'A';.

Take the Free Quiz on Java

Answer quick questions and assess your Java knowledge

Start Quiz