StringBuffer vs. StringBuilder in Java: Key Differences Explained
By Rohan Vats
Updated on Jun 11, 2025 | 16 min read | 14.68K+ views
Share:
For working professionals
For fresh graduates
More
By Rohan Vats
Updated on Jun 11, 2025 | 16 min read | 14.68K+ views
Share:
Did you know? Even with the rise of StringBuilder as a speedier, thread-safe alternative for single-threaded scenarios, StringBuffer remains a staple in Java! It’s still fully supported in the latest release, Java 21, proving that some classics never go out of style. |
In Java, Strings are immutable, which can cause performance issues when frequent modifications are needed. To solve this, Java introduced StringBuffer and StringBuilder for mutable strings.
Both classes offer similar functionality but differ in synchronization and performance. StringBuffer is synchronized, making it thread-safe but slower, while StringBuilder is not synchronized, making it faster but not thread-safe. For example, in a multi-threaded application, StringBuffer would be a safer choice, while StringBuilder would be preferred for single-threaded scenarios.
In this blog, you will explore the key differences between StringBuffer vs. StringBuilder, focusing on their performance, synchronization, and best use cases.
StringBuffer and StringBuilder are Java classes for mutable strings. The key difference is synchronization: StringBuffer is thread-safe but slower, while StringBuilder is faster but not thread-safe.
In a benchmark with 10 million append operations, StringBuffer took 7,448 ms, while StringBuilder completed the task in 6,179 ms, demonstrating its superior speed. A micro-benchmark also showed StringBuilder outperformed StringBuffer in throughput (91,076 ops/s vs. 86,169 ops/s).
However, StringBuffer ensures data integrity in multithreaded environments, which StringBuilder does not. Understanding these trade-offs helps you choose the right class for your needs.
If you're looking to sharpen your skills and make the right choice between these powerful platforms, check out these top-rated courses:
Comparison Table of StringBuffer vs. StringBuilder:
Key Factor | StringBuffer | StringBuilder |
Thread Safety | Synchronized, thread-safe | Not synchronized, not thread-safe |
Performance | Slower due to synchronization | Faster, as it doesn't have synchronization overhead |
Use Case | Suitable for multithreaded environments | Best for single-threaded environments |
Methods | Similar methods for modifying strings (append, insert, reverse, etc.) | Same methods as StringBuffer, but faster |
Memory Overhead | Slightly higher memory overhead due to synchronization | Lower memory overhead |
Introduced in | Java 1.0 | Java 5 |
Also Read: Exploring the 14 Key Advantages of Java: Why It Remains a Developer's Top Choice in 2025
Now that you have a good understanding of the differences between StringBuffer vs. StringBuilder in Java, let’s explore them each in more detail.
StringBuffer in Java is a mutable sequence of characters. Unlike String, which is immutable, StringBuffer allows modifications to the string content without creating new objects every time a change is made.
This makes StringBuffer an ideal choice when working with strings that require frequent updates, such as in loops or dynamic string manipulations. One of its key features is that it is synchronized, making it thread-safe.
Features of StringBuffer:
Example Code for StringBuffer in Java:
public class StringBufferExample {
public static void main(String[] args) {
// Creating a StringBuffer object
StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer("Hello");
// Appending to the StringBuffer
sb.append(" World!");
// Inserting at a specific position
sb.insert(6, "Java ");
// Reversing the StringBuffer
sb.reverse();
// Output the result
System.out.println("Modified StringBuffer: " + sb);
}
}
Output:
Modified StringBuffer: !dlroW avaJ olleH
In this example, we see how StringBuffer efficiently handles string modifications by appending, inserting, and reversing, all while keeping the original object and without creating multiple instances like String would.
Also Read: Learn 50 Java Projects With Source Code (2025 Edition)
Now that you understand what is StringBuffer, let’s explore StringBuilder in Java.
StringBuilder in Java is similar to StringBuffer in that it allows for mutable sequences of characters. Unlike String, which is immutable, StringBuilder lets you modify strings without creating new objects each time.
However, StringBuilder is not synchronized, making it faster than StringBuffer in single-threaded environments. It is ideal for applications where thread safety is not a concern and performance is a priority.
Features of StringBuilder:
Example Code for StringBuilder in Java:
public class StringBuilderExample {
public static void main(String[] args) {
// Creating a StringBuilder object
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder("Java");
// Appending to the StringBuilder
sb.append(" Programming");
// Inserting at a specific position
sb.insert(4, "Language ");
// Reversing the StringBuilder
sb.reverse();
// Output the result
System.out.println("Modified StringBuilder: " + sb);
}
}
Output:
Modified StringBuilder: gnimmargorP egauL avaJ
In this example, StringBuilder efficiently handles string manipulations like appending, inserting, and reversing. It's faster than StringBuffer because it does not use synchronization, making it ideal for single-threaded applications.
Also Read: Java Language History: Key Milestones and Development
Now that you know how StringBuilder differs from StringBuffer, let’s look at the similarities between the two.
Similarities Between StringBuffer and StringBuilder: What's Common Between Them?
While StringBuffer and StringBuilder have key differences, they share many similarities. Both classes are designed for mutable strings, meaning they allow modifications without creating new objects, which helps improve performance when working with strings that require frequent changes.
They both offer similar methods for string manipulation, such as append(), insert(), reverse(), and delete(). Additionally, they provide a dynamic buffer that grows as the string content increases, ensuring efficient memory management.
Common Features of StringBuffer and StringBuilder:
Key Factor | StringBuffer | StringBuilder |
Mutability | Allows modification of string content | Allows modification of string content |
Common Methods | append(), insert(), reverse(), delete(), replace(), setLength() | append(), insert(), reverse(), delete(), replace(), setLength() |
Dynamic Growth | Automatically grows as content increases | Automatically grows as content increases |
Buffer Size Management | Internal buffer size increases dynamically | Internal buffer size increases dynamically |
Performance Benefit | Efficient for repeated string manipulations | Efficient for repeated string manipulations |
String Manipulation | Suitable for frequent modifications in loops or dynamic string-building scenarios | Suitable for frequent modifications in loops or dynamic string-building scenarios |
Both StringBuffer and StringBuilder are designed for performance when working with strings that undergo frequent modifications. While their thread-safety features differ, their core functionality for string manipulation remains quite similar.
Also Read: Best Java Courses Online (Recommended by Developers)
Next, let’s look at how they compare in terms of performance analysis.
StringBuilder outperforms StringBuffer in single-threaded scenarios because it lacks synchronization overhead. For example, in 1,000,000 operations, StringBuilder completes in 633 ms versus StringBuffer’s 808 ms. With 100,000,000 operations, StringBuilder finishes in 6,179 ms, while StringBuffer takes 7,448 ms.
This performance gap is due to StringBuffer’s thread safety, which adds extra processing. In summary, use StringBuilder for speed in single-threaded code and reserve StringBuffer for thread-safe, multithreaded environments.
To check the performance of StringBuilder and StringBuffer, let us see an example with code:
public class Conc_Test{
public static void main(String[] args){
sTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
StringBuilder sb1 = new StringBuilder("Lorem");
for (int j=0; j<9999; j++){
sb1.append("Ipsum");
}
System.out.println("StringBuilder Time: " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - sTime));
long sTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
StringBuffer sb2 = new StringBuffer("Lorem");
for (int j=0; j<9999; j++){
sb2.append("Ipsum");
}
System.out.println("StringBuffer Time: " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - sTime));
}
}
As we can acknowledge from the code above, StringBuilder performs better than StringBuffer in speed. Additionally, the memory consumption of the two differs, with StringBuffer using more memory than StringBuilder.
Output:
StringBuilder Time: 0ms
StringBuffer Time: 15ms
Also Read: Careers in Java: How to Make a Successful Career in Java in 2025
Next, let’s look at how upGrad can help you develop relevant skills for StringBuffer vs. StringBuilder in Java, so you can add it to your portfolio and enhance your career.
Choosing between StringBuffer vs. StringBuilder depends on your application’s needs. Use StringBuffer in multithreaded environments, like a banking system, where thread-safety is crucial. For single-threaded applications, such as a game or real-time data processor, StringBuilder offers better performance due to its lack of synchronization. Understanding these scenarios ensures optimal performance and reliability in your Java projects.
To help you deepen your understanding of these classes and Java in general, upGrad offers specialized software development courses. These courses provide hands-on projects, the latest tools, and best practices in Java development, ensuring you’re well-prepared for the demands of 2025 and beyond.
In addition to the core Java topics, here are some free programs that can complement your learning journey:
Boost your career with our popular Software Engineering courses, offering hands-on training and expert guidance to turn you into a skilled software developer.
Master in-demand Software Development skills like coding, system design, DevOps, and agile methodologies to excel in today’s competitive tech industry.
Stay informed with our widely-read Software Development articles, covering everything from coding techniques to the latest advancements in software engineering.
References:
https://blog.vanillajava.blog/2024/11/stringbuffer-is-dead-long-live.html
https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/string-vs-stringbuffer-vs-stringbuilder
https://www.baeldung.com/java-string-builder-string-buffer
408 articles published
Software Engineering Manager @ upGrad. Passionate about building large scale web apps with delightful experiences. In pursuit of transforming engineers into leaders.
Get Free Consultation
By submitting, I accept the T&C and
Privacy Policy
India’s #1 Tech University
Executive PG Certification in AI-Powered Full Stack Development
77%
seats filled
Top Resources