View All
View All
View All
View All
View All
View All
View All
    View All
    View All
    View All
    View All
    View All

    Actor Critic Model in Reinforcement Learning

    By Mukesh Kumar

    Updated on May 06, 2025 | 21 min read | 1.2k views

    Share:

    Did you know? The Actor-Critic model was inspired by the brain's decision-making process, where the "actor" chooses actions and the "critic" evaluates them in real time? Recent advancements have allowed Actor-Critic methods, like A3C and DDPG, to scale effectively in high-dimensional continuous action spaces, especially in robotics.

    The Actor Critic model is a powerful technique in reinforcement learning that combines two key components. The actor decides which action to take and the critic evaluates the chosen action. 

    This model enables an agent to make decisions and learn from feedback simultaneously, balancing exploration and exploitation efficiently. The Actor Critic model is widely used in complex decision-making scenarios where traditional methods may struggle. 

    This tutorial will explore the fundamentals of the Actor Critic model, providing you with the tools to implement it in reinforcement learning systems.

    Improve your machine learning skills with our online AI and ML courses — take the next step in your learning journey! 

    Understanding the Actor Critic Model in Reinforcement Learning

    The Actor-Critic model is a foundational concept in reinforcement learning (RL) that involves two key components working together to help an agent make better decisions. 

    The actor is responsible for choosing actions based on the policy, which is a strategy for selecting actions, while the critic evaluates the actions by estimating the value function, which measures the long-term rewards of a given state. 

    Together, these components combine the strengths of both policy-based methods (actor) and value-based methods (critic) to optimize learning.

    Scenario: Imagine you're training a self-driving car to navigate through a city with the goal of reaching a destination efficiently.

    • Actor: The actor is like the car's decision-making system. At each point in time (or state), it decides what action to take, such as turning left, right, or going straight. The actor uses its current understanding (policy) to select these actions, aiming to find the best path to the destination.
    • Critic: The critic evaluates the actions taken by the actor. After each action, the critic looks at the outcome. Did the car get closer to the destination, or did it take a detour? 

    The critic estimates the value of the state-action pair (e.g., "turning left at this intersection"), helping the actor understand whether its decision was good or bad. Based on this evaluation, the critic provides feedback (such as a positive or negative reward), guiding the actor's future decisions.

    In this example, the actor learns by trying different actions (driving strategies) and adjusting based on feedback from the critic. The critic helps the actor by evaluating how well each decision contributed to the goal of reaching the destination, helping it improve over time.

    By having both the actor and critic working in parallel, the Actor Critic model can be more stable and efficient than traditional reinforcement learning methods, especially in complex environments.

    In 2025, professionals who have a good understanding of machine learning concepts will be in high demand. If you're looking to develop skills in AI and ML, here are some top-rated courses to help you get there:

    Also Read: Reinforcement Learning vs Supervised Learning: Key Differences

    Now that you know what is actor critic model, let’s look at how exactly it functions in reinforcement learning.

    How Does Actor Critic Model Work in Reinforcement Learning? Step-by-Step Guide

    What makes Actor Critic reinforcement learning unique is its combination of both policy optimization (through the actor) and value estimation (through the critic). This allows the agent to balance exploration and exploitation more effectively.

    In traditional reinforcement learning, an agent either relies on value-based methods (like Q-learning) or policy-based methods (like REINFORCE). The Actor Critic method combines the strengths of both. The actor adjusts the policy based on feedback from the critic, which provides a measure of how well the action performed in the current environment. 

    This synergy allows for more stable and efficient learning, especially in complex environments where both action selection and reward evaluation need to be optimized simultaneously.

    Placement Assistance

    Executive PG Program11 Months
    background

    Liverpool John Moores University

    Master of Science in Machine Learning & AI

    Dual Credentials

    Master's Degree17 Months

    Let’s dive into how these components work together step by step to refine the agent's decision-making process.

    Step 1: Initialization

    The actor is initialized with a random policy, meaning it hasn’t learned the best way to navigate the maze yet. The policy is typically represented as a neural network that maps the state (position in the maze) to an action (move up, down, left, or right).

    The critic is initialized with a random value function, which estimates how good a state is. For instance, the critic may start by assuming that being at any position in the maze is equally valuable (a random value estimate).

    You can get a better understanding of neural networks with upGrad’s free Fundamentals of Deep Learning and Neural Networks course. Get expert-led deep learning training, and hands-on insights, and earn a free certification.

    Step 2: Agent Starts in the Maze

    The robot begins at a random position in the maze (let’s say it starts in the top-left corner). The actor takes the current position as input and selects an action, such as "move right" or "move down", based on its policy. At the beginning, since the actor’s policy is random, it might select a poor action like "move left" or "move down" when it should move right.

    Step 3: Action Execution

    The robot moves in the maze according to the action selected by the actor. For example, if the actor chooses to move "right", the robot moves to the adjacent position in the maze.

    Step 4: Feedback from the Environment

    The robot receives feedback from the environment. This feedback comes in the form of rewards (or penalties). For instance, if the robot moves closer to the exit, it receives a positive reward (+1). If it moves into a dead end, it may receive a penalty (e.g., -1).

    Step 5: Critic Evaluates the Action

    After the action is taken and the reward is received, the critic evaluates the actor’s decision. The critic does this by estimating the value of the current state (where the robot is) after taking the action. For example, if the robot moves to a state closer to the exit, the critic’s value function might indicate a higher value for that state.

    The critic calculates the temporal difference (TD) error, which is the difference between the predicted value (what the critic thought the state was worth) and the actual reward plus the estimated future value.

    • TD Error: TD = (Reward + Future Value) - Current Value.

    If the robot moves closer to the exit, the TD error will be positive, indicating that the action was good.

    Step 6: Actor Updates Its Policy

    Based on the feedback from the critic, the actor adjusts its policy. If the critic provides a positive TD error (i.e., the action brought the robot closer to the goal), the actor will reinforce the action. If the TD error is negative (i.e., the action moves the robot away from the goal), the actor adjusts its policy to avoid similar actions in the future.

    In simple terms, the actor uses the feedback from the critic to improve the selection of future actions. The actor adjusts its neural network weights to prefer actions that result in higher rewards.

    Step 7: Repeat the Process

    This process continues for multiple episodes, where the robot keeps moving through the maze, choosing actions, receiving feedback, and refining its policy.

    As the robot explores the maze more, the actor gets better at choosing the most efficient path towards the exit, while the critic becomes more accurate in evaluating states and actions.

    Step 8: Convergence to Optimal Policy

    Over time, the actor’s policy converges towards an optimal strategy for navigating the maze, based on the rewards it receives. The critic, in turn, converges to a more accurate value function, helping the actor make better decisions.

    By the end of the training, the robot can effectively navigate the maze, selecting the best possible actions based on its learned policy, guided by the value estimates provided by the critic.

    Now, let’s look at the example of robot navigating a maze in greater detail:

    Let’s say the maze is a 5x5 grid, where the robot starts at the top-left corner and needs to reach the bottom-right corner. The robot’s goal is to learn the best sequence of moves to reach the goal as quickly as possible, maximizing its total reward (positive feedback for getting closer to the goal and negative feedback for hitting obstacles or dead ends).

    • State (Initial position): The robot is at position (0,0) (top-left corner).
    • Actor’s Action: The actor randomly selects the action "move right".
    • Critic’s Evaluation: The robot moves to position (0,1), and the critic assigns a value based on proximity to the goal. The critic gives a value of 0.5 to (0,1) because it is slightly closer to the goal.
    • Reward: Since the robot moved in the right direction, it receives a positive reward (+1).
    • TD Error: The critic updates its value for position (0,0), using the TD error calculation. If the TD error is positive, the critic reinforces that state-action pair as valuable.

    Over many iterations, the actor gradually learns which actions lead to higher rewards and adjusts its policy accordingly, while the critic helps guide those adjustments by evaluating state values and providing feedback.

    Through this back-and-forth process, the Actor Critic method allows the agent to converge to an optimal policy, improving its performance over time.

    Also Read: Q Learning in Python: What is it, Definitions [Coding Examples] 

    Now that you know how the Actor Critic model works in reinforcement learning, let’s look at the different variants of Actor Critic and how they are different.

    Different Variants of Actor Critic Model: A Comparison

    The Actor Critic model has several variants, each designed to address specific challenges in reinforcement learning. This includes efficiency, stability, or the ability to handle different types of environments. Different variants were developed to overcome limitations in earlier versions and improve performance in various contexts.

    For example, A2C and A3C were created to address issues like slow learning and local optima by either synchronizing or asynchronously running multiple agents. On the other hand, DDPG was introduced to handle continuous action spaces, while TRPO focuses on ensuring stable policy updates in high-dimensional environments. 

    Now, let’s explore these widely used variants, highlighting their differences, advantages, and use cases.

    1. A2C (Advantage Actor-Critic)

    A2C is a synchronous version of the Actor-Critic algorithm where the agent’s policy and value function are updated based on the advantage, which is the difference between the expected reward and the actual reward.

    Advantages:

    • Simple to implement.
    • More stable than traditional Actor-Critic methods due to the use of advantages.

    Use cases: Best for environments with relatively stable dynamics, like simple gaming tasks and environments with low dimensional action spaces.

    2. A3C (Asynchronous Advantage Actor-Critic)

    A3C uses multiple agents running in parallel on different environments. Each agent learns asynchronously, which helps speed up the learning process and avoids local optima by exploring more diverse state-action spaces.

    Advantages:

    • Can run in parallel on multiple workers, speeding up training significantly.
    • Reduces the risk of getting stuck in local minima due to the asynchronous nature.

    Use cases: Highly effective in large-scale environments like video games or robotic control tasks requiring significant exploration and faster learning.

    3. DDPG (Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient)

    DDPG is designed for continuous action spaces. It uses a deterministic policy, where the actor produces a single action for each state, and the critic evaluates that action. DDPG also uses experience replay to improve stability by reusing past experiences.

    Advantages:

    • Works well with continuous action spaces.
    • Incorporates both the actor-critic structure and experience replay, making it stable for complex environments.

    Use cases: Ideal for continuous control tasks such as robotic arm manipulation, autonomous driving, or any task requiring precise, continuous actions.

    4. TRPO (Trust Region Policy Optimization)

    TRPO is a policy optimization algorithm that uses a constrained optimization approach to prevent large policy updates, ensuring more stable learning. The actor updates its policy based on the surrogate objective function, with a constraint to limit the deviation from the old policy.

    Advantages:

    • Provides guaranteed improvements in policy performance.
    • More stable than other policy gradient methods by ensuring updates are not too drastic.

    Use cases: Suitable for tasks requiring high stability and precision in policy updates, such as complex robotic control or high-dimensional tasks where stability is critical.

    Here’s a summary of their key differences:

    • Parallelization: A3C runs asynchronously across multiple workers, making it faster for large-scale environments, while A2C is synchronous.
    • Action Spaces: DDPG is specifically tailored for continuous action spaces, unlike A2C and A3C, which typically handle discrete actions.
    • Stability: TRPO offers the highest stability through constrained updates, while A2C and A3C trade some stability for speed in learning.
    • Complexity: DDPG and TRPO are more complex to implement than A2C and A3C, but they handle more advanced and challenging environments effectively.

    Each of these variants is suited to different types of reinforcement learning tasks, depending on the problem's requirements.

    If you want to understand how to work with AI and ML, upGrad’s Executive Diploma in Machine Learning and AI can help you. With a strong hands-on approach, this AI ML program ensures that you apply theoretical knowledge to real-world challenges, preparing you for high-demand roles like AI Engineer and Machine Learning Specialist.

    Also Read: Types of Machine Learning Algorithms with Use Cases Examples

    Next, let’s look at the advantages and drawbacks of the Actor Critic reinforcement learning.

    Benefits and Limitations of Actor Critic Reinforcement Learning

    The Actor Critic reinforcement learning combines the advantages of both value-based and policy-based reinforcement learning techniques, making it highly efficient and stable in many environments. 

    However, it may fall short in certain scenarios, especially when dealing with large or continuous state and action spaces, where it can become computationally expensive. Additionally, the method can suffer from high variance in the critic's value estimates, leading to slow convergence. It also requires careful hyperparameter tuning and can be inefficient in terms of sample usage. This might make it less suitable for environments where data collection is costly or time-sensitive.

    Below is a comparison of its key benefits and limitations:

    Benefits

    Limitations

    Stability: By using the critic to evaluate actions, the Actor-Critic method ensures more stable learning compared to pure policy-gradient methods, which can be noisy. High Variance: Despite improved stability, the Actor-Critic method still suffers from high variance in its estimates, which can slow down convergence.
    Efficient Learning: The method balances exploration (trying new actions) and exploitation (choosing actions that have been successful in the past) efficiently, helping the agent learn faster. Complexity in Tuning: Tuning the actor and critic networks can be complex, especially in large or continuous state and action spaces. Hyperparameters like learning rates need careful adjustment.
    Parallelization (in variants like A3C): Asynchronous variants like A3C allow multiple agents to learn in parallel, speeding up training significantly. Sample Efficiency: While Actor-Critic methods work well in many scenarios, they often require a large amount of interaction with the environment (samples) to converge, which can be inefficient.
    Applicability to Continuous Action Spaces: Variants like DDPG extend the Actor-Critic method to handle continuous action spaces effectively, making it useful for real-world tasks like robotics. Computationally Expensive: Some variants, like A3C and TRPO, require significant computational resources, particularly in environments with high-dimensional state spaces.

    To maximize the effectiveness of the Actor Critic reinforcement learning, consider the following best practices:

    • Algorithm Selection: Choose the appropriate variant (A2C, A3C, DDPG, or TRPO) based on the complexity of the environment and the type of action space (discrete or continuous).
    • Hyperparameter Tuning: Carefully tune key hyperparameters such as learning rates, discount factors, and the advantage function to prevent instability and improve convergence. Use grid search or random search for systematic tuning.
    • Exploration-Exploitation Trade-Off: Ensure a good balance between exploration (trying new actions) and exploitation (relying on known successful actions). Techniques like epsilon-greedy or entropy-based exploration can be helpful.
    • Experience Replay (for DDPG): If using DDPG, consider implementing experience replay to improve sample efficiency and stabilize training by reusing past experiences.
    • Critic Regularization: Regularize the critic’s value function to avoid overfitting, especially when dealing with complex or high-dimensional environments.
    • Stabilize Learning: Use techniques like advantage normalization or target smoothing to reduce the variance in learning and ensure smoother policy updates.

    Also Read: Your ML Career: Top Machine Learning Algorithms and Applications

    Now that you’re familiar with the benefits and limitations of the Actor Critic model in reinforcement learning, let’s look at some of its real life applications.

    What are the Use Cases of Actor-Critic Method? 5 Real-Life Examples

    The Actor Critic model is a popular choice across various industries because of its ability to balance exploration and exploitation, providing a robust framework for learning in complex, dynamic environments. Different industries choose the Actor-Critic model for its unique ability to handle both continuous and discrete action spaces, allowing it to adapt to a wide range of real-world problems.

    Here are some of its key applications:

    1. Robotics: Navigating Complex Environments

    As a robotics engineer, you need to design a robot that can navigate through an unpredictable environment with various obstacles while optimizing its path to reach a goal. Traditional methods struggle with adapting to dynamic surroundings and long-term planning.

    Using the Actor-Critic method, you implement a reinforcement learning agent where the actor chooses actions like moving forward, turning, or stopping, and the critic evaluates how close the robot is to the goal after each action, providing feedback to improve future actions.

    Outcome: Over time, the robot becomes adept at navigating the environment, efficiently avoiding obstacles and finding the most optimal paths, resulting in faster and more accurate autonomous movements.

    2. Gaming: Enhancing AI Performance in Complex Games

    As a game developer, you're designing an AI opponent for a strategy game. The opponent must make intelligent decisions, adapt to the player's strategy, and improve over time. Traditional algorithms struggle to learn long-term strategies.

    You use the Actor-Critic method to train the AI. The actor selects actions based on the game’s state (e.g., move a character, attack, or defend), while the critic evaluates these actions based on the game’s rewards (winning, gaining resources, etc.). This feedback loop helps the AI learn optimal strategies.

    Outcome: The AI improves its decision-making over time, providing a more challenging and adaptive opponent, enhancing the player’s experience.

    3. Autonomous Vehicles: Safe and Efficient Driving

    As an autonomous vehicle engineer, you're tasked with developing a system that enables vehicles to drive in real-time, considering the safety of passengers while making efficient route choices. The challenge is balancing exploration (learning new routes) with exploitation (choosing the safest path).

    You implement the Actor-Critic method, where the actor makes driving decisions like turning, accelerating, or braking, and the critic evaluates the safety and efficiency of those decisions. The critic’s feedback refines the actor’s choices over time.

    Outcome: The vehicle continuously learns from its environment, improving its ability to safely navigate complex traffic situations while optimizing travel time, making it a reliable and adaptive self-driving system.

    4. Recommendation Systems: Personalizing User Experience

    As a data scientist working on a recommendation system for an e-commerce platform, you need to personalize product suggestions for users. The challenge is to predict the right products to recommend while balancing exploration (offering new items) and exploitation (recommending popular items).

    You implement the Actor-Critic method, where the actor suggests products based on user behavior and preferences, and the critic evaluates the recommendations by measuring user engagement (clicks, purchases, etc.). The feedback helps improve future suggestions.

    Outcome: The system becomes more accurate over time in predicting items that users are likely to engage with, improving user satisfaction and increasing sales.

    5. Finance: Optimizing Investment Strategies

    As a financial analyst, you're working to develop an algorithm for portfolio management that maximizes returns while minimizing risk. The challenge is adapting to market changes and balancing short-term rewards with long-term financial goals.

    You use the Actor-Critic method to train the portfolio management algorithm. The actor selects buy, sell, or hold actions for various stocks based on market conditions, and the critic evaluates these actions by calculating the portfolio’s return and risk. The critic’s feedback fine-tunes the actor’s strategy.

    Outcome: The algorithm improves its decision-making over time, optimizing investment strategies and increasing the portfolio’s returns, while effectively managing risk in changing market conditions.

    Also Read: Your ML Career: Top Machine Learning Algorithms and Applications

    To solidify your understanding of the Actor Critic model in reinforcement learning, test your knowledge with a quiz. It’ll help reinforce the concepts discussed throughout the tutorial and ensure you're ready to apply them in your projects.

    Quiz to Test Your Knowledge on Actor-Critic Model in Reinforcement Learning

    Assess your understanding of the Actor-Critic method, its components, advantages, limitations, and best practices by answering the following multiple-choice questions. 

    Test your knowledge now!

    1. What is the main function of the "actor" in the Actor-Critic method?
    a) To evaluate the state of the environment
    b) To choose actions based on the current policy
    c) To calculate the value of a state
    d) To update the value function of the critic

    2. How does the "critic" contribute to the Actor-Critic method?
    a) It directly chooses the actions
    b) It evaluates the quality of the actions selected by the actor
    c) It updates the state transitions
    d) It explores the environment

    3. Which action spaces are best suited for Actor-Critic reinforcement learning?
    a) Continuous action spaces only
    b) Discrete action spaces only
    c) Both continuous and discrete action spaces
    d) None of the above

    4. What is a key advantage of using the Actor-Critic method over pure policy gradient methods?
    a) It avoids high variance in gradient estimates
    b) It provides more accurate value estimates
    c) It uses deterministic policies
    d) It eliminates the need for exploration

    5. Which of the following is a limitation of the Actor-Critic method?
    a) It cannot handle high-dimensional state spaces
    b) It suffers from high variance in the critic’s estimates
    c) It is not suitable for real-time decision-making
    d) It requires less computational power than other methods

    6. What is the role of the "advantage" function in the Actor-Critic method?
    a) It calculates the expected reward of an action
    b) It provides feedback to the actor about the value of an action relative to others
    c) It ensures the critic provides unbiased evaluations
    d) It selects the best possible action

    7. In which type of environment would the Actor-Critic method be most beneficial?
    a) In environments with large and complex state and action spaces
    b) In environments where only immediate rewards are relevant
    c) In environments where the agent receives minimal feedback
    d) In environments with small and simple datasets

    8. What is one key disadvantage of using the Actor-Critic method in a highly dynamic environment?
    a) It can be computationally expensive and slow to converge
    b) The critic’s evaluations become too rigid and fail to adapt
    c) It is difficult to scale to large action spaces
    d) It cannot handle continuous state spaces effectively

    9. Which of the following is a best practice when implementing the Actor-Critic method?
    a) Use it for large, complex environments that require continuous action updates
    b) Always use a fixed learning rate for both actor and critic
    c) Limit the use of the critic to simple value function approximations
    d) Use experience replay to speed up the learning process

    10. How does the Actor-Critic method manage the exploration-exploitation trade-off?
    a) By using the critic to guide the exploration of new actions
    b) By maintaining a fixed set of actions and exploring them equally
    c) By having the actor explore only the best-known actions
    d) By reducing exploration over time and focusing on exploitation

    This quiz will help you evaluate your understanding of the Actor Critic model, how it operates, its strengths, and the challenges it addresses in reinforcement learning.

    Also Read: 5 Breakthrough Applications of Machine Learning

    You can also continue expanding your skills in machine learning with upGrad, which will help you deepen your understanding of advanced ML concepts and real-world applications.

    Expand your expertise with the best resources available. Browse the programs below to find your ideal fit in Best Machine Learning and AI Courses Online.

    Discover in-demand Machine Learning skills to expand your expertise. Explore the programs below to find the perfect fit for your goals.

    Discover popular AI and ML blogs and free courses to deepen your expertise. Explore the programs below to find your perfect fit.

    Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

    1. How do I manage the instability in learning when using the Actor-Critic method?

    2. What should I do if my actor is taking suboptimal actions even after many training episodes?

    3. How do I decide between using A2C, A3C, or DDPG for my task?

    4. What if my critic is overfitting to the training environment and not generalizing well?

    5. How do I manage the exploration-exploitation trade-off effectively in continuous environments?

    6. What if the critic is not providing useful feedback to the actor?

    7. How can I speed up the convergence of the Actor Critic method without sacrificing stability?

    8. Why is the Actor Critic method more computationally expensive than other reinforcement learning methods?

    9. What should I do if the critic is providing incorrect value estimates for certain states?

    10. How do I deal with the "credit assignment problem" in Actor Critic methods?

    11. Can the Actor Critic method be applied to multi-agent environments? If so, how?

    Mukesh Kumar

    272 articles published

    Get Free Consultation

    +91

    By submitting, I accept the T&C and
    Privacy Policy

    India’s #1 Tech University

    Executive Program in Generative AI for Leaders

    76%

    seats filled

    View Program

    Top Resources

    Recommended Programs

    LJMU

    Liverpool John Moores University

    Master of Science in Machine Learning & AI

    Dual Credentials

    Master's Degree

    17 Months

    IIITB
    bestseller

    IIIT Bangalore

    Executive Diploma in Machine Learning and AI

    Placement Assistance

    Executive PG Program

    11 Months

    upGrad
    new course

    upGrad

    Advanced Certificate Program in GenerativeAI

    Generative AI curriculum

    Certification

    4 months