Normalization vs Standardization in Machine Learning
By Rahul Singh
Updated on Jun 15, 2026 | 7 min read | 3.84K+ views
Share:
Looks like you're browsing from the
United StatesSome programs may not be available in your location
Some programs may not be available in your location
Switch to upGrad USAll courses
Certifications
More
By Rahul Singh
Updated on Jun 15, 2026 | 7 min read | 3.84K+ views
Share:
Table of Contents
Normalization and standardization are two essential feature scaling techniques used in machine learning to ensure that numerical variables are on a comparable scale. Since many algorithms are sensitive to differences in feature ranges, applying the right scaling method can improve model performance, training speed, and prediction accuracy.
In the debate of normalization vs standardization, normalization rescales data to a fixed range, typically between 0 and 1, while standardization transforms data so it has a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. Understanding when to use each technique is a key part of building effective machine learning models.
In this blog, you will learn exactly what normalization and standardization in machine learning mean, how they are different, when to use which, and where they overlap.
Let us start with a side-by-side view. This makes it easier to understand the core differences before we go deeper.
Parameter |
Normalization |
Standardization |
| What it does | Rescales data to a fixed range, usually [0, 1] | Centers data around mean 0 with standard deviation 1 |
| Formula | (x - min) / (max - min) | (x - mean) / standard deviation |
| Output range | Bounded (typically 0 to 1) | Unbounded (can go negative or above 1) |
| Effect of outliers | Heavily affected by outliers | Less sensitive to outliers |
| Works best when | Distribution is unknown or not Gaussian | Data roughly follows a Gaussian distribution |
| Common algorithms | Neural networks, KNN, image processing | SVM, linear regression, logistic regression, PCA |
| Preserves shape of distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Sensitive to scale | Yes, depends on min and max values | Less so, since it uses statistical properties |
| Also called | Min-Max Scaling | Z-score Scaling |
| When to avoid | When outliers are present in the dataset | When distribution is heavily skewed |
This table gives you a quick picture of normalization vs standardization. Now let us understand both techniques properly, one at a time.
Also Read: 15 Dimensionality Reduction in Machine Learning Techniques
Normalization is the process of scaling your data so that all values fall within a specific range. Most commonly, that range is 0 to 1.
The formula looks like this:
x_normalized = (x - min) / (max - min)
So if your column has values like 20, 50, and 80, and the min is 20 while the max is 80:
Every value gets mapped into the range [0, 1].
When your features have very different scales, machine learning models that rely on distance or gradients can behave poorly. Normalization fixes this by putting everything on a level playing field.
Real example: Imagine you have a dataset with two columns. One column has house prices in lakhs (say, 20 to 200), and another has house age in years (say, 1 to 50). Without normalization, the model might treat price as more important just because the numbers are bigger. That is not fair to the data.
Also Read: Feature Engineering for Machine Learning: Methods & Techniques
Normalization is very sensitive to outliers. If your dataset has extreme values, they will compress all the other values into a very small range. For example, if most salaries are between 30,000 and 80,000 but one entry says 10,000,000, all the normal values will get squished close to 0.
In such cases, standardization is a better choice. More on that next. Now explore standardization in detail to get a clear view on normalization vs standardization.
Also Read: K Means Clustering in R: Step by Step Tutorial with Example
Standardization, also called Z-score normalization, transforms your data so that it has a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1.
The formula is:
x_standardized = (x - mean) / standard deviation
Here is what that means in plain English. You take each value, subtract the average of the entire column, and divide by how spread out the data is (standard deviation).
If the column values are 10, 20, and 30:
Notice the output can be negative, and it is not bounded between 0 and 1. That is completely fine and expected.
Many algorithms assume your data is normally distributed. When features have very different scales but the model expects them to behave similarly, the results get skewed.
Standardization in machine learning helps models like Support Vector Machines (SVM), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and Linear Regression perform much better. These models are built around statistical assumptions, and standardization respects those assumptions.
Also Read: Top 48 Machine Learning Projects [2026 Edition] with Source Code
Even though normalization vs standardization produce different outputs, they share some important common ground. Understanding these similarities helps you see why both are valid scaling methods.
Similarity |
Explanation |
| Both Are Feature Scaling Techniques | Both normalization and standardization rescale numerical features so that variables with larger values do not dominate machine learning models. |
| Both Preserve Data Order | If one value is greater than another before scaling, it remains greater after scaling. The ranking of data points does not change. |
| Both Are Linear Transformations | Both methods apply mathematical transformations without significantly altering the underlying distribution or relationships within the data. |
| Both Improve Model Convergence | Scaling features helps optimization algorithms such as gradient descent converge faster and more reliably during training. |
| Both Are Unsupervised Transformations | Neither method uses the target variable for scaling. They rely only on the feature values being transformed. |
| Both Should Be Fitted on Training Data Only | To avoid data leakage, the scaler should be fitted on the training dataset and then applied to validation or test data. |
| Both Are Reversible | The transformed values can be converted back to their original scale using inverse transformation techniques. |
| Both Are Data Preprocessing Steps | Neither normalization nor standardization is a machine learning algorithm. They are preprocessing techniques applied before model training. |
These shared properties are why standardization vs normalization is often discussed together. They solve a similar problem, just with different approaches.
Also Read: Types of Algorithms in Machine Learning: Uses and Examples
Choosing between the two comes down to three factors: your data, your algorithm, and your goal.
Ask yourself:
Algorithm |
Recommended Technique |
| Neural Networks | Normalization |
| KNN, K-Means | Normalization |
| Image classification | Normalization |
| SVM | Standardization |
| Linear / Logistic Regression | Standardization |
| PCA | Standardization |
| Decision Trees / Random Forest | Neither needed |
| Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) | Neither needed |
If you are not sure which will perform better, train your model with both and compare the results. Validation accuracy, loss curves, or confusion matrices will usually tell you which version works better for your specific problem.
Let us take a dataset with two columns: Age and Income.
Person |
Age |
Income (INR) |
| A | 25 | 30,000 |
| B | 35 | 80,000 |
| C | 45 | 1,50,000 |
After Normalization (Min-Max):
Person |
Age (normalized) |
Income (normalized) |
| A | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| B | 0.50 | 0.42 |
| C | 1.00 | 1.00 |
After Standardization (Z-score):
Person |
Age (standardized) |
Income (standardized) |
| A | -1.22 | -1.07 |
| B | 0.00 | -0.27 |
| C | 1.22 | 1.34 |
Both tables show that the scale is now comparable across columns. But notice that normalization keeps everything between 0 and 1, while standardization allows negative values and goes above 1.
If person C's income were 10,00,000 (an outlier), normalization would crush A and B's values near 0. Standardization handles this better.
Also Read: Machine Learning Tools: A Guide to Platforms and Applications
Normalization and standardization are both essential tools in data preprocessing. They solve the same core problem (features with incompatible scales) but take different approaches.
If you want to build a strong foundation in data preprocessing and machine learning concepts, upGrad's programs in data science and AI give you hands-on experience with real datasets, guided projects, and industry mentors who help you understand not just how to apply these techniques but why they work.
Want personalized guidance in AI and upskilling? Speak with an expert for a free 1:1 counselling session today.
Normalization scales data to a fixed range (usually 0 to 1) using the minimum and maximum values. Standardization rescales data so the mean becomes 0 and the standard deviation becomes 1. Normalization is bounded; standardization is not.
Neither is universally better. Normalization works well for neural networks and distance-based algorithms. Standardization suits algorithms like SVM, PCA, and linear regression. The right choice depends on your data distribution and the algorithm you are using.
No. Algorithms like Decision Trees, Random Forest, and XGBoost are not sensitive to feature scales. They split based on thresholds, so neither normalization nor standardization is required for them.
If you skip scaling, algorithms that are sensitive to feature magnitudes (like KNN, SVM, or gradient descent-based models) may produce inaccurate results. One feature with large values will dominate others, leading to a biased or poorly performing model.
Technically yes, but it is not recommended. Applying both can distort your data unnecessarily. Choose one technique based on your algorithm and data characteristics, not both together.
Always after splitting. Fit the scaler only on your training data. Then apply the same transformation to your test data. Fitting on the full dataset before splitting causes data leakage, which leads to overly optimistic model performance.
Neural networks typically respond better to normalized inputs (values between 0 and 1). This helps with stable gradient updates during backpropagation. Standardization can also work but may need tuning depending on the activation functions used.
Yes, Z-score normalization is another name for standardization. It uses the formula (x - mean) / standard deviation to center data at 0 with a spread of 1. The term "Z-score normalization" is commonly used in statistics, while "standardization" is more common in machine learning.
No. Standardization does not remove outliers. It makes the scaling less influenced by extreme values compared to normalization, but the outliers remain in the dataset. If outliers are a serious problem, you need to handle them separately using techniques like capping or removal before scaling.
Not always. Tree-based models (Decision Trees, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting) do not require feature scaling. But for algorithms like KNN, SVM, logistic regression, and neural networks, scaling is important for reliable performance.
Scikit-learn provides easy-to-use classes for both. Use MinMaxScaler for normalization and StandardScaler for standardization. Both follow the same fit-transform pattern. For deep learning, frameworks like TensorFlow and PyTorch also have built-in normalization layers.
67 articles published
Rahul Singh is an Associate Content Writer at upGrad, with a strong interest in Data Science, Machine Learning, and Artificial Intelligence. He combines technical development skills with data-driven s...
India’s #1 Tech University
Executive Program in Generative AI for Leaders
76%
seats filled