SMOTE in Machine Learning: How It Fixes Imbalanced Datasets

SMOTE in machine learning is one of the most widely used techniques for handling imbalanced datasets. When one class has significantly fewer examples than another, machine learning models often struggle to identify the minority class correctly. This can lead to poor predictions, especially in fraud detection, medical diagnosis, and risk assessment.

Class imbalance is one of the most common problems in real-world machine learning. When your dataset has 95% of one class and 5% of another, your model doesn't actually learn the minority class. It just learns to predict the majority and still looks accurate on paper. SMOTE in machine learning directly addresses this by generating synthetic samples for the underrepresented class. 

This blog covers how SMOTE works, when you should use it, what its limitations are, and how it compares to other techniques. You'll walk away with a practical understanding you can apply immediately.

Explore upGrad's Machine Learning programs to master essential machine learning techniques such as data preprocessing, handling imbalanced datasets, feature engineering, model evaluation, and predictive modeling.

What Is SMOTE in Machine Learning?

SMOTE stands for Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique. It's an algorithm introduced in 2002 by Chawla et al. to handle class imbalance without simply duplicating existing minority samples.

Here's why duplication doesn't work well. If you copy the same minority samples ten times, your model just memorizes those exact data points. It doesn't actually learn the pattern. SMOTE takes a smarter approach.

It creates new, synthetic data points by interpolating between existing minority class samples. Not copying. Interpolating.

How the algorithm works:

• Pick a minority class data point
• Find its K nearest neighbors (K is usually set to 5)
• Randomly select one of those neighbors
• Create a new point somewhere along the line connecting the two

The result is a synthetic sample that's plausible, not a duplicate. This exposes the model to a wider variety of minority class examples during training.

A Quick example

Say you're building a fraud detection model. Out of 10,000 transactions, only 200 are fraudulent. Without balancing, your model will likely predict "not fraud" for almost everything and still get 98% accuracy. SMOTE generates new synthetic fraud examples so the model actually learns what fraud looks like.

Term	Meaning
Majority Class	The class with more samples (e.g., non-fraud)
Minority Class	The class with fewer samples (e.g., fraud)
Synthetic Sample	A new data point created by SMOTE, not from real data
K Nearest Neighbors	The closest data points used to generate new samples
Oversampling	Increasing the minority class size

SMOTE is one of the most widely referenced techniques for handling imbalance. That said, it's not a silver bullet. Knowing when and how to apply the smote technique in machine learning matters just as much as understanding the algorithm itself.

Do read: Discover How Classification in Data Mining Can Enhance Your Work!

When Should You Use SMOTE?

Not every imbalanced dataset needs SMOTE. Before you apply it, ask yourself what the ratio actually looks like.

A 60-40 split doesn't need intervention. A 99-1 split almost certainly does. The sweet spot where SMOTE adds clear value is typically in the 80-20 to 99-1 range for binary classification.

SMOTE Works Well When	SMOTE Is Less Effective When
Binary or multi-class imbalance	Very few minority samples (2–3)
Minority class has 5–10+ samples	Mostly categorical features
Features are numerical	Minority samples are widely scattered
Model favors the majority class	High noise or outliers in minority data

One scenario worth flagging is that SMOTE can introduce noise if the minority class samples themselves are noisy or mislabeled. Synthetic points generated from bad data will just give you more bad data, spread across a larger space.

SMOTE is applied only to the training set. Never apply it to your test data. Your test set should reflect real-world distribution.

Master the concepts behind machine learning, deep learning, predictive modeling, data preprocessing, and AI-driven decision-making with Liverpool John Moores University's Master's Degree in AI & Machine Learning. Learn through hands-on projects, industry-relevant tools, and real-world applications that prepare you for high-growth AI careers.

SMOTE Variants You Should Know

The original SMOTE algorithm has been extended in several ways. Different problems call for different variants.

• Borderline-SMOTE

Standard SMOTE generates samples from all minority points. Borderline-SMOTE focuses only on minority samples near the decision boundary, where misclassification is most likely. It's more targeted and often performs better on harder classification problems.

Also read: What are Sampling Techniques? Different Types and Methods

• ADASYN (Adaptive Synthetic Sampling)

ADASYN assigns more synthetic samples to minority points that are harder to learn, based on their local neighborhood density. It's adaptive, meaning it focuses effort where the model struggles most. Think of it as SMOTE with a priority system.

• SMOTE-Tomek

This combines SMOTE with Tomek Links, which removes ambiguous samples near the decision boundary after oversampling. You oversample first, then clean up the noise. The result is a cleaner boundary between classes.

• SMOTE-ENN

Similar to SMOTE-Tomek, but uses Edited Nearest Neighbors instead of Tomek Links for cleaning. It removes any sample whose class label differs from the majority label among its neighbors. This tends to produce a smoother decision boundary.

Variant	What It Does Differently
Borderline-SMOTE	Focuses on samples near class boundaries
ADASYN	Generates more samples in harder-to-learn regions
SMOTE-Tomek	Oversamples, then removes borderline noise
SMOTE-ENN	Oversamples, then applies ENN cleaning

Real-World Applications

SMOTE appears across industries. Some common examples include:

Must read: Step-by-Step Guide to Learning Python for Data Science

How to Implement SMOTE in Python

Python's imbalanced-learn library makes this straightforward. It's built to work alongside scikit-learn.

from imblearn.over_sampling import SMOTE 
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split 
 
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=42) 
 
smote = SMOTE(k_neighbors=5, random_state=42) 
X_resampled, y_resampled = smote.fit_resample(X_train, y_train) 
 

A few things to get right:

• Split your data before applying SMOTE, not after
• Only fit SMOTE on training data
• Set random_state for reproducibility
• Check class distribution before and after with Counter(y_resampled)

You don't need a perfect ratio. Aiming for a 70-30 or 80-20 split after SMOTE is often enough and avoids over-generating synthetic points.

What to evaluate after resampling:

Don't rely on accuracy. Use metrics that account for class imbalance.

• Precision and Recall
• F1-Score (especially the minority class F1)
• AUC-ROC
• Confusion Matrix

If your model's recall on the minority class improves significantly after SMOTE, the technique is working.

Also read: Exploratory Data Analysis: Role & Techniques for Business Insights

Advantages and Limitations of SMOTE in Machine Learning

SMOTE isn't perfect. Knowing its weaknesses saves you from chasing false improvements.

The biggest issue is the overfitting risk. Since SMOTE creates synthetic points between real ones, if the original samples are tightly clustered, the new points won't add much variety. Your model can still overfit.

SMOTE doesn't work well with high-dimensional data either. When you have hundreds of features, the "nearest neighbor" concept becomes unreliable due to the curse of dimensionality. Points that appear close in high-dimensional space may not actually be similar.

Another real concern is that SMOTE generates samples based on feature space, not on actual domain knowledge. It doesn't know that some combinations of features are impossible in the real world. That can produce synthetic samples that look valid statistically but don't make sense practically.

Advantages of SMOTE	Limitations of SMOTE
Improves minority class learning	Can create noisy samples
Reduces overfitting vs. duplication	Ignores the majority-class distribution
Generates synthetic data points	May create class overlap
Works with most ML algorithms	Less effective for complex data patterns
Easy to implement with libraries	Performance depends on data quality
Improves recall and F1-score	May amplify existing outliers

There are alternatives worth considering alongside SMOTE. Class weights in your model are sometimes enough. Undersampling the majority class works well when you have enough data. Ensemble methods like EasyEnsemble or BalancedRandomForest handle imbalance internally and can outperform SMOTE in some scenarios.

When SMOTE Won't Help

Scenario	Why SMOTE Struggles
Very few minority samples	Not enough neighbors to generate meaningful synthetic data
Severe class overlap	Synthetic samples may increase confusion between classes
Domain-specific data generation needed	Statistical interpolation can't capture domain knowledge
Highly scattered minority samples	Generated points may not represent real patterns
Mostly categorical features	Standard SMOTE is designed for numerical data

Must read: Python Libraries Explained: List of Important Libraries

Conclusion

SMOTE in machine learning solves a real, practical problem. Imbalanced datasets are everywhere, and models trained on them without intervention often fail the people who matter most, the ones in the minority class.

The algorithm is approachable. The implementation is clean. But it works best when you understand the data first. Check your class distribution, choose the right variant, apply it only to training data, and measure the right metrics.

Don't treat SMOTE as a magic fix. Treat it as a tool you understand well enough to use wisely.

Ready to start your journey? Book a free consultation with upGrad today to find the best path for your career.