View All
View All
View All
View All
View All
View All
View All
View All
View All
View All
View All
View All
View All
View All
View All
View All
View All
View All
View All
View All
    View All
    View All
    View All
    View All
    View All
    View All
    View All

    Podman vs Docker: Which Container Tool is Right for You?

    Updated on 02/09/2024507 Views

    Introduction to Podman and Docker

    Podman and Docker are two prominent systems that currently attract the attention of many in the tech industry. Docker is a US start-up company founded in 2013 that popularized the containerization process by offering an effective containerization tools platform. It has a strong and mature framework with great supporting tools and a large developer community. 

    Overview of Podman

    What is Podman?

    Podman is a container management tool developed by Red Hat for creating pods in open-source environments. It is a container run-time built for lateral computing without relying on a host machine’s system daemon, which makes it different from Docker. Podman uses a Docker-compatible CLI, allowing users to perform commands for containers and image creation and manipulation. It makes it possible to support the Open Container Initiative (OCI) specification, which may work with numerous container tools and environments.

    Key Features of Podman

    1. Daemonless Architecture: Another advantage of using Podman vs Docker is that it does not use a central daemon that is responsible for securing the overall environment and can be a source of failures due to its single points of failure.
    1. Rootless Mode: The article also highlighted another unique feature in Podman, which allows containers to be managed in a manner that prevents users from accessing and controlling files that they are not allowed to, thus making the container more secure for the application.
    1. Docker Compatibility: This is possible because the CLI commands in Podman are almost similar to those used with Docker. Therefore, transferring a command from one application to another is not a problem when using the other.
    1. Pod Management: It also recognizes the concept of the “pod,” which is what Kubernetes calls the concept of grouped containers that share the same storage and networking.
    1. OCI Compliance: Some of the main things I have learned from using Podman on container images include that it is affirmed to be compliant with the OCI image and runtime; this means that users have plenty of choices and manage their images.

    Benefits of Using Podman

    1. Enhanced Security: The privileged mode and separate by store in settings modes of the Podman’s operation modes differ and prevent the Podman as a privileged daemon and root access.
    1. Flexibility: One of the significant features of Podman is that it has been developed to work with the Docker commands and General standards developed by the OCI, allowing this tool to work with commonly applied workflows and existing tools.
    1. Stability and Reliability: Since the daemon is specific only to running Podman and does not have a critical role in the system, Podman is more reliable.
    1. Kubernetes Native: Speaking about the managerial aspect of Podman it should be mentioned that the switch to Podman pod management is quite easy if the migration is made to Kubernetes systems.
    1. User-Friendly: Podman’s CLI is intentionally trimmed and referred to for specific features specific to every class of developers and the concerned system administrators.

    Overview of Docker

    What is Docker?

    Docker can be regarded as a platform aimed at providing capabilities for containerizing applications and automating the process of their deployment and scaling. Founded in 2013, Docker uses containers to take action on applications independent of the host environment. Docker is an open-source environment that allows the deployment of applications and their dependencies into a standard format package, called a Docker container, that will work similarly across any computing environment from development to production.

    Key Features of Docker

    1. Docker Engine: It is the core of the container, supporting its growth, delivery and resource control.
    1. Docker Hub: Docker Container Registry is a service for storing and sharing human-friendly package names based on images of container files.
    1. Docker Compose: A bash script to manage a distributed environment whose description has been described using the Docker Compose file.
    1. Docker Swarm: Docker Swarm is A Swiss army knife for docker that allows multiple docker engines to work as a single resource.
    1. Docker CLI: An application that is a wrapper over the Docker daemon and offers a CLI for running containerized applications, containerization, networking, and storage.

    Advantages of Docker

    1. Portability: Docker operates on the concept of stand-alone isolation, which packages an application’s environment and all the resources, such as binaries and configuration files, in a tight unit so that everything behaves the same regardless of the environment.
    1. Efficiency: Pods can, therefore, be perceived as systems’ virtualization at the application level, and the individual “virtualization” units operate under the shared host’s kernel.
    1. Isolation: They can have a separate environment from other applications within a system, which may disrupt the running application.
    1. Speed: Less time will be needed for the containers' init and shutdown to better facilitate faster implementation of development, test cycles, and so forth.
    1. Ecosystem and Community: Docker is not a simple CLI; it also has several tools and services and an active community.

    Difference Between Podman and Docker

    This implies that both Podman vs Docker are platforms that facilitate the process of containerization which is the process of creating and running the application with all its dependencies as an enclosed entity. While they will be applied for similar performance, they are diverse in their structure, security and codes used, portability, compatibility, ecosystem support, and installation processes.

    Security: Isolating Containers and Separating Daemon Processes.

    1. Podman:
    • Rootless Containers: A full overview of this feature is that it will improve security because a smaller area on each machine will be exposed to risk.
    • Daemonless Architecture: It is not necessarily centered around a central daemon, and therefore, no daemon can seize unauthorized access that could potentially threaten a system’s security.
    1. Docker:
    • Rootless Mode: Pods can run containers as a non-root user, a new feature compared to Podman.
    • Daemon-based Architecture: Dockerd is the central daemon of Docker and it deals with everything related to containers which can become a single point of failure and might threaten the security of the Docker platform.

    Compatibility and Ecosystem Support

    1. Podman:
    • Compatibility: It supports different browser architectures and is also OCI compatible to ensure compatibility with other tools like containers.
    • Ecosystem Support: Pragmatic Scalability: Escalating Developer Adoption in Multiple Container-Friendly Platforms: Specifically Those with Security or Compliance Focus.
    1. Docker:
    • Compatibility: Algorand is well supported and has even had several cooperation services and platforms.
    • Ecosystem Support: The seductive and flexible design of the globe and generous support makes many deeply enamored by developers as well as businesses.

    Installation and Setup Processes

    Feature

    Podman

    Docker

    Installation

    Installable via package managers (dnf, apt, etc.)

    Installable via package managers, Docker website

    Setup

    Simple setup, often with default configurations

    Involves setting up the Docker daemon

    Rootless Installation

    Default, no additional configuration required

    Requires specific setup steps for enabling rootless mode

    Configuration Files

    Individual container configurations, no central daemon

    Centralized configuration through a daemon (docked)

    System Requirements

    Lightweight, minimal dependencies

    Slightly heavier due to daemon requirements

    Docker Desktop vs Podman

    Overview of Docker Desktop

    Podman vs Docker Desktop is a software developed specifically for macOS and Windows that allows users to interact with Docker tools, containers, and images in an interactive interface. It incorporates Docker Engine, Docker CLI, Docker Compose, Docker Content Trust, Kubernetes, and Credential Helper. Docker Desktop eases an individual’s work when transforming applications from development into production.

    Key Features:

    1. New and improved Docker Engine and Docker CLI.
    1. Achieving orchestration with Docker Compose for multi-container apps.
    1. Container orchestration for container integration with Kubernetes.
    1. Power management and system configuration with graphical user interface.

    Podman Overview on Desktop Environment

    Podman is a double peculiarity because it does not use any daemon and is an open-source container engine. Podman is already supported by Linux distribution. However, it is also possible to set it up on macOS and Windows based on Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 (WSL2) solutions or Virtual Machines, respectively.

    Key Features:

    1. Daemonless architecture
    1. Improving the security controls for managing rootless containers.
    1. Support from Docker CLI commands.

    Performance and Resource Consumption

    Aspect

    Docker Desktop

    Podman on Desktop

    Resource Consumption

    Higher due to the Docker daemon and additional services

    Lower, no central daemon running

    Performance

    Slightly slower startup times due to daemon initialization

    Faster startup times due to daemonless architecture

    Memory Usage

    Higher memory usage from Docker daemon and Kubernetes

    With lower memory usage, containers run as individual processes, and lower memory usage is due to - the absence of a central daemon.

    CPU Usage

    Continuous CPU usage by the Docker daemon

    Lower CPU usage: containers use CPU only when active

    Docker vs Podman: Detailed Comparison

    Architecture Differences

    Aspect

    Docker

    Podman

    Architecture

    Daemon-based

    Daemonless

    Daemon

    A centralized daemon (docked) manages all containers

    No central daemon; each container is an independent process

    Security

    Requires elevated privileges (though rootless mode is available)

    Designed for rootless operation from the start

    Isolation

    Containers managed by a single daemon

    Containers run as individual processes, improving isolation and security

    System Overhead

    Higher due to the daemon running continuously

    Lower as there is no central daemon

    Final Thoughts

    Podman vs Docker revealed that there are certain pros of using Podman, which are ideal for some users, while its counterparts are suitable for others. Docker, with its historical image and wide range of tooling, is still widely used for developing software and even enterprises deploying and scaling software where orchestration is important and software compatibility is necessary. 

    It uses a daemon that’s typical for systems and CLI, which many users are familiar with, but it may be dangerous as it operates with root privileges. Although decision and risk are in the hands of Docker since it is more reliable than Podman, both tools are of equal importance as they provide effective management and deployment of container applications.

    FAQs

    1. Is Podman better than Docker?

    Podman is useful for users who want to use containers without root-level privileges, and Podman is much more secure and safer than docker, whereas docker is useful for users who require containers to work with advanced orchestration.

    2. Can Docker be replaced with Podman?

    Yes, because Podman can seamlessly fill the shoes of Docker in almost all the ways it could but still focusing on security and rootless pods.

    3. What are the disadvantages of Podman?

    It does not have orchestrations like Docker Swarm, or at least not many at the moment, or it may have less help or support from the community.

    4. Is Podman like Kubernetes?

    We can say that they differ because Podman is a container engine and Kubernetes is a container orchestrator, but Podman can be used to render Kubernetes YAML.

    5. Why replace Docker with Podman?

    From the cost reduction and security perspective Podman from Docker is to use rootless containers plus eliminate the daemonic process in the centralized process.

    6. Why choose Podman over Docker?

    Red Hat Podman provides the user with improved protection options and means for operating in rootless mode and using its daemonless design.

    7. Is Podman slower than Docker?

    They offer the same performance level, and performance changes slightly based on use and environment.

    8. Is Podman 100% compatible with Docker?

    Podman can also be compared to Docker in that it supports images, translation and CLI commands in similar ways.

    9. Is Podman free or paid?

    It works fine as the Podman is not at all proprietary and Podman is 100% free and open-source.

    image
    Join 10M+ Learners & Transform Your Career
    Learn on a personalised AI-powered platform that offers best-in-class content, live sessions & mentorship from leading industry experts.
    advertise-arrow

    upGrad Learner Support

    Talk to our experts. We are available 7 days a week, 9 AM to 12 AM (midnight)

    text

    Indian Nationals

    1800 210 2020

    text

    Foreign Nationals

    +918068792934

    Disclaimer

    1.The above statistics depend on various factors and individual results may vary. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

    2.The student assumes full responsibility for all expenses associated with visas, travel, & related costs. upGrad does not provide any a.