The Gates Cambridge Scholarship personal statement, limited to 500 words, should showcase your alignment with the scholarship’s four key criteria: outstanding academic ability, relevance of your chosen course, leadership potential, and dedication to making a positive difference in the world. It should link your previous accomplishments to your future ambitions, illustrating how studying at Cambridge will empower you to create meaningful impact.
In addition to highlighting your achievements and goals, your statement should convey your personal values and motivations. The essay should give the committee a clear sense of who you are as a person, your intellectual curiosity, and your commitment to using your education to drive positive change. This guide shows you how to reflect those criteria clearly and includes four original sample essays you can adapt to your voice and goals.
Before bumping onto the Gates Cambridge Scholarship essay writing, here are some key highlights:
Category
Key Details
Scholarship Type
Fully funded postgraduate scholarship
Host Country
United Kingdom
Host University
University of Cambridge
Course Start
October 2026
Deadlines
US round: October;
International round: December–January.
Eligibility Criteria
Academic excellence, leadership potential, service commitment, and course fit.
Documents Required
Transcripts, CV, 2 academic references, 1 Gates reference, research proposal (PhD), English test- IELTS, TOEFL (if required)
Interview
25–30 minute interview after departmental nomination (online or in person)
Funding Coverage
University fees, maintenance stipend, and travel costs.
What the Gates Cambridge Committee Looks for
To guide your personal statement, it helps to understand what the Gates Cambridge scholarship selection committee prioritizes in applicants. The following key areas highlight what the committee looks for when evaluating candidates, helping you shape an essay that demonstrates both excellence and purpose.
1. Academic Excellence:
Highlight specific research projects, publications, or presentations that showcase your ability to conduct rigorous, original work and contribute to your field.
Emphasize advanced coursework, methodological training, or technical skills that prepare you for graduate-level study and demonstrate mastery of core concepts.
Show how your academic achievements reflect curiosity, critical thinking, and a sustained commitment to exploring complex problems, not just high grades.
Provide examples of independent work or collaborations that illustrate initiative, intellectual depth, and problem-solving under challenging conditions.
2. Reasons for Choosing Cambridge:
Explain why Cambridge’s specific departments, faculty, labs, or research centres are essential for achieving your academic goals.
Highlight how particular methodologies, resources, or academic cultures at Cambridge align with your research interests and approach.
Demonstrate prior engagement with Cambridge’s work such as reading faculty publications, attending seminars, or collaborating on projects that shows familiarity and intentionality.
Connect your short- and long-term ambitions with Cambridge’s opportunities, showing that the choice is strategic, deliberate, and mutually beneficial.
3. Commitment to Improving Lives:
Provide concrete examples of initiatives you started or contributed to those positively impacted individuals, communities, or systems.
Include measurable outcomes whenever possible, such as the number of people served, policies influenced, programs sustained, or tools created.
Show how your actions reflect ethical responsibility, empathy, and a long-term perspective on social or environmental change.
Emphasize learning from challenges or failures to highlight growth and deepen your ability to make meaningful contributions.
4. Leadership Potential:
Illustrate leadership through decisions you made, teams you built, and projects you managed, emphasizing personal responsibility and initiative.
Highlight examples where you established structures or processes that continued to have an impact beyond your involvement.
Demonstrate collaboration and coalition-building, showing how you inspired, guided, or empowered others toward shared goals.
Reflect on the values and principles that guide your leadership, emphasizing integrity, resilience, and vision for creating lasting positive change.
How to Write a Gates Cambridge Scholarship Essay
To craft a standout Gates Cambridge essay, follow these steps to structure your story, highlight your achievements, and show measurable impact. Each step helps you connect past experiences, academic goals, and leadership potential to your future contribution at Cambridge. Use them as a roadmap to make your personal statement clear, focused, and compelling.
Step 1: Define Your Core Throughline
Pick 2–3 themes: Identify 2–3 central ideas (e.g., climate resilience, data justice, community co-design) that consistently define your academic, leadership, and service experiences.
Choose 3–5 specific moments that prove them: Select concrete examples—research projects, community initiatives, or leadership experiences—that demonstrate these themes in action and show your values in practice.
Step 2: Map Your Essay Structure
Hook: Begin with an engaging scene or pivotal decision that draws the reader in and introduces your core themes.
Context + Action: Describe the problem you faced, your role, the steps you took, and your decision-making process. Highlight leadership, problem-solving, and initiative.
Results: Show tangible outcomes of your actions, using measurable impact when possible, and discuss lessons learned or insights gained.
Cambridge Fit: Explain why Cambridge, your department, lab, center, or supervisor is uniquely suited to your work.
Future Impact: Illustrate how the Gates Cambridge Scholarship will help scale your impact and enable long-term contributions to society.
Step 3: Be Specific About Cambridge
Courses, labs, and supervisors: Name specific programs, labs, centers, or supervisors and explain how their work aligns with your goals.
Methods and outputs: Highlight tangible outputs you plan to produce, such as datasets, open-source tools, policy briefs, or publications, demonstrating feasibility and preparation.
Step 4: Demonstrate Impact Logically
Problem → Action → Result → Reflection: Structure examples clearly, showing the challenge, what you did, the outcomes, and reflections on growth or learning.
Use numbers and metrics: Quantify impact with participants served, percentage improvements, funds raised, or publications produced to strengthen credibility.
Step 5: Revise Ruthlessly
Clarity and precision: Remove vague statements, use strong active verbs, vary sentence length, and ensure the essay flows logically.
Forward-looking conclusion: End with a forward-focused insight that emphasizes how Cambridge and the scholarship will amplify your long-term goals and societal impact.
Gates Cambridge Scholarship Essay Examples
The sample essays provided below are provided as guidance to give a clearer idea of how to structure and present your own essay; demonstrating ways to communicate your experiences, achievements, and leadership effectively. Applicants should adapt their essay to their specific field, chosen course, and personal journey. Throughout, it is important to highlight impact and growth while staying within the prescribed word limit.
Example 1: Purpose & “Why Cambridge” Personal Statement (650–700 words)
I learned to measure heat not only in degrees but in choices. In my hometown, summer blackouts are in season. When the grid stumbles, clinics shift vaccines into borrowed coolers and grandparents sleep on tiled floors. During my second year of engineering, I began recording household temperatures in three neighborhoods using low-cost sensors I assembled from scrap lab inventory. At 2 a.m., one sensor in a top-floor rental hit 36.8°C inside.
The data clarified a pattern: heat risk clustered where renters had little leverage. I built an open-source thermal dashboard that has layered temperature, roof material, tree cover, and rent status. Volunteer mappers added informal settlements; a community health NGO overlaid ER admissions for heat exhaustion. A city councilor asked for recommendations. We proposed “Cool Roof Clauses” leases that allow tenants to approve reflective paint and lightweight insulation funded by a municipal microgrant. Six buildings piloted the policy; mean indoor nighttime temperatures fell by 2.4°C, and heat complaints dropped 41% over eight weeks.
I am applying for the MPhil in Engineering for Sustainable Development at Cambridge to develop evidence-based cooling strategies for low-income urban housing that integrate materials science, human behavior, and policy design. Cambridge’s strength is not only technical excellence; it is a systems approach that asks whether an elegant solution will survive contact with a landlord’s spreadsheet or a tenant’s budget.
My prior work spans data collection, modeling, and implementation. In a university lab, I evaluated cool roof coatings and developed a low-cost emissivity measurement rig. In a civic fellowship, I led a cross-sector pilot with the city’s housing authority, a paint cooperative, and a tenants’ union. We created a “cooling kit” (reflective paint, door sweeps, cross-ventilation guides) that reduced peak indoor temperatures by up to 3.1°C in test units. The limiting factor was not physics; it was governance: approvals lagged, and maintenance contractors rotated monthly.
At Cambridge, I hope to learn from interdisciplinary faculty working on urban resilience, building performance simulation, and policy evaluation. I want to deepen my modeling with EnergyPlus and urban microclimate models, and to couple that with participatory design co-creating interventions with tenants who endure heat, not just simulating them. I am especially excited by the course’s focus on whole-systems project work, where technical, social, and economic constraints collide constructively.
My long-term plan is to establish a Cooling Commons Lab that develops open-source tools and policy templates for secondary cities facing heat stress, in partnership with tenants’ associations and municipal governments. The Gates Cambridge Scholarship is not only funding, but also a community that treats excellence as accountable to others. With this support, I will build solutions that move from paper to plaster to policy—because a safe night sleep should not depend on the color of a roof or the strength of a lease.
Example 2: Academic Fit / Research Proposal Summary (500–550 words)
Proposed Course: MPhil in Engineering for Sustainable Development (1-year)
Research Focus: Evaluating low-cost passive cooling retrofits for multi-family rental housing in heat-vulnerable neighborhoods, integrating building physics, social adoption dynamics, and municipal policy.
Background & Rationale Passive cooling is a proven, low-energy strategy, yet adoption in rental markets lags due to split incentives and approval of friction. Existing studies emphasize thermal performance but under-specify policy mechanisms that unlock adoption at scale. I aim to quantify both thermal gains and institutional levers (lease clauses, microgrants, contractor workflows) that enable durable uptake.
Objectives
Model thermal performance of reflective coatings, attic insulation, and cross-ventilation strategies across typical building typologies from two target cities.
Field-test a bundle of low-cost retrofits in 60–80 rental units; measure indoor temps, humidity, and nighttime comfort metrics over the summer.
Evaluate policy instruments (e.g., pre-approved retrofit lists, microgrants, standard landlord consent forms) via a randomized encouragement design with property managers.
Deliver an open-source toolkit: design specs, procurement lists, implementation workflows, and a policy brief for municipalities.
Methods
Simulation: Calibrate EnergyPlus models using sensor data (iButton/HOBO), with sensitivity analysis for roof albedo and infiltration rates.
Field Measurement: Deploy dataloggers and occupant diaries (short prompts via SMS) to capture perceived comfort and adoption barriers.
Policy Evaluation: Difference-in-differences on treated vs. control buildings; qualitative interviews with landlords, tenants, and inspectors to surface governance bottlenecks.
Equity Lens: Disaggregate results by renter protections, building age, and floor level to identify distributional effects.
Why Cambridge The programme’s whole-systems approach and emphasis on real-world project delivery align with cross-disciplinary methods. I hope to collaborate with researchers in building performance evaluation, urban sustainability, and municipal innovation. Cambridge’s partnerships with local councils and its culture of open, rigorous evaluation provide the ideal environment to test interventions that are technically sound and administratively feasible.
Outcomes & Impact This work will produce a replicable set of retrofit bundles and policy templates that reduce indoor heat exposure for renters. Post-degree, I plan to support municipal partners in scaling the model and publish open-source guides to accelerate adoption in similar climates globally.
Example 3: Leadership & Service (500 words)
The cooling kit began as a spreadsheet and became a coalition.
When summer temperatures surged, our city hotline logged hundreds of “unlivable heat” complaints from renters. The default response “buy a fan” ignores electrical loads and income realities. I convened a working group: a tenants’ union organizer, two materials engineers, a pediatrician, a city housing official, and a paint cooperative manager. We aligned on three measurable goals: reduce nighttime indoor temps, cut heat-related ER visits among participating buildings, and make the process landlord-friendly.
We built a three-part kit: reflective roof paint (with a community volunteer crew), door sweeps and shading film to reduce heat ingress, and a cross-ventilation guide translated into four languages. A small grant funded sensor; the pediatrician helped us track symptoms; the housing official pre-approved materials to streamline permissions.
The execution was messy. Our first building had a skeptical manager who worried about warranty voids. We responded with data sheets, a waiver, and a visit from the paint supplier. During installation, rain forced a reschedule; volunteer fatigue set in. We adapted: smaller crews, weekday evening shifts, and a WhatsApp group that paired each building with a “kit captain” for installation and follow-up.
Within six weeks, average peak nighttime indoor temperatures fell by 2–3°C across pilot units; self-reported sleep quality improved weekly SMS check-ins; the pediatric clinic reported fewer nighttime wheezing episodes. The tenants’ union presented results at City Council; the city created a microgrant stream for landlord-approved cool roof coatings.
Leadership, I learned, is operational empathy: understanding a landlord’s risk calculus without abandoning a tenant’s urgency. It is also infrastructure-building—training new kit captains, writing one-page guides, and setting up a parts procurement pipeline so the project outlives any one volunteer. Our coalition has now completed 18 buildings; three more are scheduled before peak heat.
Service started as a response to calls. It has grown into a system that answers before the phone rings.
Example 4: Commitment to Improving the Lives of Others / Character (450 words)
Integrity, for me, is measured in who benefits first.
When a donor offered to fund “green improvements” for homeowners, our data showed renters suffered most from heat exposure. Redirecting funds risked losing the grant. I requested a meeting armed with maps and clinic logs. We reframed the project around “first, the hottest homes”, regardless of ownership. The donor agreed to a pilot with transparent metrics. Within two months, 70% of installations served renters; complaints dropped significantly. The donor expanded the grant and publicly adopted the renter-first policy.
Later, we faced a trade-off: reflective coatings that were cheaper but less durable vs. premium products that would serve fewer homes. We proposed a hybrid procurement: premium for sun-exposed roofs with multi-year payback benefits; standard for shaded or lower-load buildings. Publishing our criteria made the process defensible and fair.
These choices taught me that character is not rigidity; it is fidelity to outcomes for those with the least power. It means sharing credit, publishing failures, and welcoming scrutiny. It means insisting that the first degree a solution serves is not Celsius, it is dignity.
Why These Gates Cambridge Scholarship Essays Work
To craft a compelling Gates Cambridge essay, it’s important to focus on the elements that selection committees value most. The following pointers highlight how to demonstrate factors that may help your application communicate both credibility and vision.
Clear Cambridge Fit:
Shows exactly why Cambridge is the ideal environment for the applicant’s academic and research goals.
Highlights specific course choices, research methods, labs, centres, or collaborative styles that align with their planned work.
Demonstrates how Cambridge’s resources, faculty, and interdisciplinary environment uniquely support the applicant’s ambitions.
Specific, Verifiable Impact:
Provides measurable evidence of achievements, including numbers, pilots, stakeholders engaged, and policy changes.
Ensures that every claim is backed by concrete examples, making the impact credible and traceable.
Shows how previous initiatives created tangible, documented results that others can learn from or replicate.
Leadership as Systems:
Emphasizes building sustainable processes or systems rather than achieving one-off results.
Highlights strategic planning, coalition-building, and creating structures that persist beyond the applicant’s direct involvement.
Demonstrates foresight in designing solutions that can scale or continue without constant oversight.
Service with an Equity Lens:
Focuses on initiatives benefiting the most affected or marginalized populations first.
Shows thoughtful engagement in service that addresses structural inequities and societal gaps.
Illustrates a commitment to improving lives ethically, inclusively, and sustainably.
Forward Trajectory:
Presents a clear, coherent vision for the applicant’s future contributions.
Explains how the Gates Cambridge Scholarship will accelerate research, leadership, and societal impact.
Connects past achievements to scalable long-term goals, showing readiness for sustained contribution.
Common Mistakes to Avoid in Gates Cambridge Essays
Even strong applicants can weaken their Gates Cambridge essays by overlooking key expectations of the selection committee. The issues below are not about lack of achievement, but about how motivation, fit, leadership, and impact are communicated. Being aware of these common missteps can help ensure your essay remains focused, credible, and closely aligned with the scholarship values.
1. Unclear Motivation and Weak Cambridge Fit:
Explaining academic interests without clearly showing why Cambridge is the right place to pursue them.
Failing to connect goals with specific courses, departments, research approaches, or institutional strengths.
Leaving the committee unsure whether Cambridge was chosen intentionally or simply named for prestige.
2. Overemphasis on Titles Instead of Substance:
Listing leadership positions or honors without explaining what was actually done in those roles.
Focusing on status rather than decisions made, challenges faced, or responsibility taken.
Missing the opportunity to show leadership through initiative, judgment, and sustained contribution.
3. Superficial Name-Dropping:
Mentioning a prospective supervisor, lab, or centre without explaining how their work aligns with your interests.
Omitting discussion of shared methods, research questions, or approaches.
Making academic references feel generic rather than thoughtful and informed.
4. Generic Language Without Evidence:
Relying on vague statements such as “I am passionate about” without concrete examples.
Failing to show how interests developed through experience, research, or service.
Weakening credibility by prioritizing emotion over demonstrated engagement.
5. Lack of an Equity or Impact Lens:
Describing projects or goals without clarifying who benefits most from the work.
Overlooking how outcomes affect underrepresented or vulnerable communities.
Missing alignment with the Gates Cambridge emphasis on improving lives and promoting fairness.
Final Tips for a Strong Gates Cambridge Scholarship Essay
The following tips focus on refinement rather than reinvention. At this stage, the focus is on polishing what you have written, not adding new accomplishments or arguments. These final checks help ensure that your essay remains coherent, credible, and closely connected to the core values of the Gates Cambridge Scholarship.
Open with a scene:
Choose a moment where something didn’t quite make sense and push you to ask deeper questions.
Let the scene show uncertainty, tension, or responsibility rather than polished success.
Use it to signal the core issue you now study, research, or act on—not just a personality trait.
Quantify impact:
Ground your contribution in numbers, scope, or duration, so the reader understands scale.
Acknowledge of setbacks, constraints, or early misjudgments without dramatizing them.
Explain how iteration, feedback, or evidence changed your approach and improved outcomes.
Show method fluency:
Refer to tools, models, or analytical approaches you have actually used or studied.
Briefly explain why you chose those methods and what they allowed you to see or measure.
Signal readiness for advanced work by showing comfort with complexity and limitations.
Cambridge Fit:
Identify specific courses, labs, research groups, or supervisors that shape how you want to work.
Explain how Cambridge’s way of thinking, collaborating, or evaluating problems fits your goals.
Make sure that Cambridge is not interchangeable with another institution for your path.
Revise with tough readers:
Ask reviewers to point out vague claims, missing logic, or unsupported conclusions.
Cut language that sounds impressive but doesn’t add meaning or evidence.
Ensure the final essay reflects how you actually think, decide, and learn.
Conclusion
In the end, what matters most is the clarity with which you understand your own direction. A strong Gates Cambridge essay is not defined by polish or technique alone, but by the honesty of the journey it reflects. When applicants engage thoughtfully with their experiences examining the choices they have made and the questions that continue to shape them, their writing feels purposeful rather than performative.
This application is best approached as an opportunity for reflection, not conformity. It allows you to articulate the kind of scholar and global citizen you are becoming, grounded in intention and responsibility. If the process leaves you with greater confidence in your path and a clearer sense of why your work matters, then the essay has already served its purpose, regardless of the outcome.
What makes the Gates Cambridge Scholarship essay different from personal statements required by other global scholarships?
The Gates Cambridge essay is unique because it evaluates how deeply your academic goals intersect with public good. It emphasizes evidence-backed leadership, societal impact, and your vision for improving lives. Beyond personal narrative, it assesses your fit with Cambridge’s intellectual culture and your potential for long-term, ethical contribution.
How many drafts do applicants typically prepare before finalizing a strong Gates Cambridge essay?
Most competitive applicants prepare between six and ten drafts. Early versions focus on shaping the narrative and identifying the strongest examples, while later drafts refine clarity, evidence, and tone. Extensive revision ensures the final essay communicates maturity, intention, and alignment with the scholarship’s criteria.
Is it advisable to discuss interdisciplinary interests in a Gates Cambridge Scholarship essay?
Yes, interdisciplinary interests often strengthen your case when they meaningfully support your academic direction. Cambridge encourages cross-domain thinking, so highlighting how multiple fields inform your approach can demonstrate intellectual flexibility, originality, and your potential to tackle complex global problems through integrated methods.
How can applicants ensure their essay aligns with the Gates Cambridge mission without sounding formulaic?
Focus on authentic stories that naturally reflect the scholarship’s values rather than repeating them. Use specific examples of work, decisions, or leadership moments that demonstrate impact. Genuine alignment emerges from lived experiences, not rehearsed statements, helping your essay remain sincere and evidence-driven.
What types of experiences tend to resonate most in a Gates Cambridge essay?
Experiences that show sustained commitment, measurable change, or thoughtful innovation resonate strongly. These might include research contributions, policy work, community-led projects, or long-term leadership roles. The committee values depth, responsibility, and the ability to translate ideas into real-world impact over one-time achievements.
Are applicants expected to address their long-term career plans directly in the scholarship essay?
Yes, explicitly outlining your long-term goals helps the committee evaluate clarity of purpose. Show how Cambridge’s resources support these ambitions and how your future work will benefit society. Practical, well-considered plans demonstrate maturity and reinforce the scholarship’s focus on long-term global contribution.
How can candidates integrate storytelling techniques while maintaining an academic tone in the essay?
Use storytelling to frame motivation, challenges, or key turning points, then transition into analytical reflections. Keep emotional elements controlled and purposeful. This balance ensures your essay remains engaging while still highlighting academic logic, depth, and intellectual readiness for postgraduate-level work.
What level of detail should applicants include when referencing past research or fieldwork in the essay?
Provide enough detail to demonstrate credibility to include your role, objectives, and major outcomes while avoiding excessive technical explanations. Focus on what you learned, how the work shaped your academic direction, and why it prepared you for Cambridge. Clarity over complexity keeps your writing accessible.
Can personal hardships strengthen the Gates Cambridge Scholarship essay?
Yes, if framed carefully. Show how hardship influenced your values, resilience, or academic purpose rather than dwelling on the struggle itself. The committee looks for applicants who transform challenges into informed, responsible action, using adversity as a foundation for meaningful impact.
How important is it to show familiarity with global issues in the essay?
Demonstrating understanding of global or systemic issues adds depth and relevance to your academic goals. It signals that your work is informed by real-world needs. Link these issues to your research focus and long-term plans, showing you can contribute thoughtfully to global progress.
What can applicants do if they have limited leadership experience when writing the essay?
Leadership is measured by initiative, not by titles. Highlight instances where you took responsibility, solved problems, or helped others succeed. Even small actions like coordinating a project or redesigning a process can reflect strong leadership qualities when paired with reflection and clear outcomes.
Should the essay highlight one major experience or several smaller ones?
Either approach is effective if it supports a clear narrative. Highlighting one major experience allows deeper reflection, while multiple smaller examples show breadth and consistency. Choose based on what best demonstrates your academic direction, impact, and readiness for Cambridge’s rigorous environment.
How do time-bound achievements compare to long-term commitments in essay effectiveness?
Long-term commitments often showcase dedication and stability, while short-term achievements can demonstrate agility, problem‑solving, and quick impact. A strong essay balances both, illustrating that you can remain committed to long-range goals while also responding effectively to immediate challenges or opportunities.
Can creative fields or non-STEM applicants write compelling Gates Cambridge essays?
Definitely. Gates Cambridge values impact across all disciplines. Creative and non‑STEM applicants should highlight how their work addresses cultural, social, or structural issues. Emphasize research depth, societal relevance, and how Cambridge’s resources will amplify your contributions within your field and beyond.
How do applicants demonstrate readiness for postgraduate-level intensity in their essay?
Showcase academic experiences that require independent thought, advanced methods, or complex problem‑solving. Highlight how past research, coursework, or leadership demand discipline and analytical depth. This demonstrates intellectual maturity and signals your ability to thrive in Cambridge’s challenging academic environment.
Is it okay to critique existing systems or institutions within the Gates Cambridge essay?
Yes, constructive critique can demonstrate awareness and purpose. Ensure your critique is evidence‑based and tied to your research or future plans. Focus on solutions and improvements rather than blame. This shows maturity, critical thinking, and ethical consideration qualities the scholarship values deeply.
How do applicants avoid sounding overly idealistic when discussing future impact?
Ground your future plans in concrete experience and realistic steps. Refer to skills you’ve gained, challenges you’ve addressed, and practical strategies you aim to pursue. This ensures your ambition appears thoughtful and achievable rather than abstract or overly aspirational.
What kind of conclusion leaves a strong impression on the Gates Cambridge panel?
A strong conclusion ties your motivation, academic direction, and societal impact into a forward-looking statement. It reinforces your purpose and how Cambridge will accelerate your contribution. Avoid summarizing; instead, articulate a clear, confident vision for the change you intend to lead.
How should applicants handle technical jargon in the essay without confusing readers?
Use technical terminology only when essential and briefly explain it in accessible terms. Keep focus on your contributions, insights, and outcomes rather than complex descriptions. Clarity ensures that both academic and non-specialist reviewers understand your work and potential.
Can applicants discuss future collaborations beyond Cambridge in their essay, or is that discouraged?
Yes, mentioning broader collaborations can show long-term thinking. Ensure these future partnerships support your Cambridge goals rather than overshadow them. Emphasize how Cambridge serves as the foundation for these efforts, reinforcing the scholarship’s role in enabling your broader impact.
upGrad Abroad Editorial Team |4266 articles published
We are a dedicated team of study-abroad experts, ensuring intensive research and comprehensive information in each of our blogs. With every piece written, we aim at simplifying the overseas education ...
Refer Your Friend & Earn upto ₹15000
Help your friend upgrade to a Global Career and earn rewards together.
