What Is the Difference Between LLM and Agentic AI? A Practical Comparison
By upGrad
Updated on Jan 19, 2026 | 5 min read | 1.7K+ views
Share:
Working professionals
Fresh graduates
More
By upGrad
Updated on Jan 19, 2026 | 5 min read | 1.7K+ views
Share:
Table of Contents
LLMs generate human-like text by predicting language patterns from large datasets, which makes them effective for tasks such as writing, summarization, translation, and code assistance, on the other hand, Agentic AI systems move beyond text generation by planning actions, using tools, maintaining memory, and working step by step toward defined goals with minimal human input.
In this blog, we explain what is the difference between LLM and agentic AI, how each approach works, where they are used in practice, and how to choose the right one for real-world AI applications.
Explore upGrad’s Generative AI and Agentic AI courses to build in-demand skills, work with modern AI systems, and prepare for real-world roles in today’s fast-growing AI ecosystem.
At a high level, the difference lies in response versus action.
Advance your AI career with the Executive Post Graduate Programme in Generative AI and Agentic AI by IIT Kharagpur.
Let’s understand the difference by a quick comparison table:
Aspect |
LLM |
Agentic AI |
| What it does | Generates answers in text | Completes tasks end to end |
| How it starts | Triggered by a prompt | Triggered by a goal |
| Autonomy level | Does not work independently | Works with high autonomy |
| Type of work | Handles single-step tasks | Handles multi-step workflows |
| Memory usage | Limited to current prompt | Retains memory across steps |
| Action capability | Cannot take real actions | Can take real actions |
| Tool usage | Rare or indirect | Frequent and direct |
| Human involvement | Required at every step | Reduced with supervision |
| Example task | Writing an email draft | Sending email and tracking replies |
| Common tools | Chatbots, AI copilots | AutoGPT, agent frameworks |
Large Language Models, or LLMs, are AI systems that read and write text in a human-like way. They learn from large amounts of written data and use that learning to predict the next words in a sentence. This helps them produce clear and natural responses. Common examples include GPT-4, BERT, LLaMA, Falcon, and Mistral.
LLMs work using a transformer-based architecture that learns language patterns from very large text datasets.
This process repeats millions of times during training.
Also Read: LLM vs Generative AI: Differences, Architecture, and Use Cases
Below is a basic Python example showing how an LLM generates text using a prompt.
from transformers import pipeline
# Load a text generation pipeline
generator = pipeline("text-generation", model="gpt2")
# Provide an input prompt
prompt = "Artificial intelligence is changing"
# Generate text
output = generator(prompt, max_length=30)
print(output[0]["generated_text"])
The model does not reason or act. It only predicts text based on probability and context. This limitation is what separates LLMs from agentic AI systems.
Also Read: How to Learn Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
Agentic AI systems are designed to go beyond generating responses. They are built to work toward goals, take actions, and adapt based on results. Instead of stopping after producing text, agentic AI plans steps, uses tools, and continues operating until a task is completed.
Agentic AI follows a goal-driven execution flow rather than a single response cycle.
This loop continues until the goal is achieved, or a stopping condition is met.
Also Read: Top Agentic AI Tools in 2026 for Automated Workflows
Below is a basic Python-style example that shows how an agentic AI system might plan and execute tasks.
goal = "Collect recent AI news and summarize it"
tasks = [
"Search for recent AI news",
"Extract key points",
"Summarize findings"
]
for task in tasks:
result = execute(task)
store_in_memory(result)
final_output = generate_summary()
print(final_output)
Unlike LLMs, agentic AI systems do not stop at text generation. They actively plan, act, and adapt, which is the core difference between agentic AI and traditional language models.
Also Read: How Is Agentic AI Different from Traditional Virtual Assistants?
Understanding theory helps, but real use cases make it practical.
This is why many modern systems combine LLM vs agentic AI instead of choosing only one.
Also Read: 10+ Real Agentic AI Examples Across Industries (2026 Guide)
Choosing the right approach depends on what you want the system to do.
This combined approach is becoming common across enterprises.
Also Read: Intelligent Agent in AI: Definition and Real-world Applications
LLMs focus on understanding and generating text, while agentic AI systems go further by planning and executing actions to achieve goals. Knowing this difference helps you choose the right approach for your use case, whether you need language assistance, task automation, or a combination of both in real-world AI applications.
The difference between LLM and agentic AI is that LLMs generate text-based responses to prompts, while agentic AI systems work toward goals by planning steps, taking actions, and adjusting based on results. One focuses on language generation, the other on autonomous task execution.
LLMs work by predicting the next word based on context from large text datasets. Agentic AI systems go further by breaking goals into steps, using tools, storing memory, and continuing execution until a task is completed.
In real-world applications, the difference between LLM and agentic AI lies in execution. LLMs assist users with answers or content, while agentic AI systems actively perform tasks such as automation, research, or workflow management with minimal human intervention.
LLMs are commonly used inside agentic AI systems for reasoning and language understanding, but they are not mandatory. Agentic behavior comes from planning, memory, and execution layers. An LLM alone cannot function as an agent without these components.
No, LLMs cannot take action on their own. They generate text or code in response to prompts. Any real-world action, such as calling an API or updating a system, requires an agentic framework or external automation layer.
LLMs are best suited for language-focused tasks such as writing, summarization, translation, question answering, and code suggestions. They work well when the output is text and human decision-making remains part of the process.
Agentic AI is better for tasks that require execution and follow-through. These include workflow automation, monitoring systems, research agents, and multi-step operations where the system must act, evaluate results, and continue working.
Yes, many modern AI systems combine LLMs and agentic AI. The LLM handles reasoning and language understanding, while the agentic layer manages planning, memory, tool usage, and execution to complete complex tasks.
The difference between LLM and agentic AI in automation is that LLMs can suggest what to do, while agentic AI can actually do it. Agentic systems execute workflows, manage tasks, and operate continuously with reduced human input.
No, agentic AI systems do not replace human decision-making. Humans define goals, set constraints, and monitor outcomes. Agentic AI reduces manual effort by handling execution but still requires oversight to ensure correctness and safety.
LLMs do not have long-term memory by default. They only retain information within the current prompt or context window. Persistent memory must be added externally through databases or agentic systems.
Agentic AI systems use memory to store past actions, results, and context. This allows them to track progress, avoid repeating steps, and adapt behavior during long-running or multi-step workflows.
Most chatbots are powered by LLMs and are not agentic AI systems. They respond to user queries but do not plan tasks or take actions unless connected to an agentic framework with execution capabilities.
Agentic AI concepts are useful for beginners to understand, but building agentic systems usually requires technical skills. Beginners are better off learning LLM basics first before exploring agentic AI and autonomous workflows.
LLM costs are typically based on model usage and tokens. Agentic AI can be more expensive because it runs continuously, uses tools, stores memory, and executes multiple steps, increasing compute and operational costs.
Yes, agentic AI can work without internet access if required tools and data are available locally. Internet access expands capabilities, but it is not mandatory for all agentic AI use cases.
Industries such as software development, operations, finance, research, and customer support benefit from agentic AI. These domains often require automation, monitoring, and multi-step workflows beyond simple text generation.
Agentic AI is a major direction in AI development, especially for automation and intelligent systems. However, it complements LLMs rather than replacing them. Future AI systems are likely to combine both approaches.
Working with agentic AI often requires programming skills, understanding APIs, system design, and AI workflows. Knowledge of LLM behavior is also important, as LLMs are commonly used within agentic systems.
Beginners should start with LLMs to understand language models and prompt-based systems. Once comfortable, they can move on to agentic AI concepts such as planning, memory, tool usage, and autonomous execution.
585 articles published
We are an online education platform providing industry-relevant programs for professionals, designed and delivered in collaboration with world-class faculty and businesses. Merging the latest technolo...
Get Free Consultation
By submitting, I accept the T&C and
Privacy Policy