Difference Between LangGraph and LangChain
By Sriram
Updated on Jan 31, 2026 | 9 min read | 2.59K+ views
Share:
- Home
- Blog
- Agentic AI
- Difference Between LangGraph and LangChain
Table of Contents
View all
LangChain works best for simple, linear LLM applications where steps follow clear order and rapid prototyping matters. It suits directed acyclic graph style workflows with limited branching.
LangGraph, built as an extension of LangChain, is designed for complex, stateful, and agent-driven systems. It supports loops, persistence, and non-linear control flow. Start with LangChain for straightforward tasks and move to LangGraph when workflows require deeper coordination and control.
In this blog, you will understand what LangGraph vs LangChain, how they differ, where each one fits, and how to decide which tool works best for your use case.
Enroll now in upGrad’s Generative AI & Agentic AI courses and build future-ready AI skills today.
LangGraph vs LangChain: Core Difference Explained
The table below gives a clear, side-by-side view of how LangGraph vs LangChain differ in design, capabilities, and ideal usage. This helps you decide which tool fits your workflow without confusion.
Enroll in the IIT Kharagpur Executive PG Certificate in Generative & Agentic AI course and gain hands-on skills in AI, prompt engineering, and intelligent agents today!
Aspect |
LangChain |
LangGraph |
| Architecture | Follows a linear or DAG-style chain where steps move forward in a fixed order | Uses a graph structure with nodes and edges, allowing loops and non-linear paths |
| Workflow style | Best for simple, step-by-step execution | Built for complex, branching, and decision-driven workflows |
| State management | No native persistent state across runs | Provides built-in, persistent state handling |
| Long-running tasks | Less suited for workflows that span long sessions | Designed to support long running and resumable workflows |
| Control flow | Limited control once execution starts | Fine-grained control over how and when steps execute |
| Agent support | Works for basic agents with linear logic | Better suited for multi-agent and coordinated agent systems |
| Human involvement | Manual handling required for human input | Native support for human-in-the-loop workflows |
| Error handling and retries | Mostly custom and manual | Easier to define retries and fallback paths |
| Best use case | Rapid prototyping and straightforward LLM tasks | Production systems with complex logic and coordination |
In short, LangChain helps you move fast with simple workflows, while LangGraph gives you structure and control when workflows become stateful, non-linear, or agent driven.
Also Read: LangGraph Tools: Complete Practical Guide
What Is LangChain and How It Is Used in Real AI Applications
LangChain is a framework designed to help you build LLM-powered applications by connecting prompts, models, tools, and data sources in a simple, linear flow. It focuses on chaining steps together, so the output of one step becomes the input for the next.
This makes LangChain easy to learn and quick to use, especially when workflows follow a clear order.
Common real-world use cases
- Prompt chaining: Combine multiple prompts where the output of one step feeds directly into the next.
- RAG pipelines: Retrieve documents, pass context to the model, and generate answers in a fixed sequence.
- Tool calling: Connect APIs, databases, or search tools to an LLM for simple task execution.
- Basic agents: Run agents that follow a linear decision flow without heavy branching.
Also Read: Agentic RAG Architecture: A Practical Guide for Building Smarter AI Systems
Why teams choose LangChain
- Easy to set up and extend
- Large library of integrations
- Good fit for quick experiments and MVPs
Where it fits best
Scenario |
Why LangChain works |
| Prototyping | Fast and flexible setup |
| Simple chatbots | Linear conversation flow |
| Search assistants | Fixed retrieval steps |
| Internal tools | Predictable execution |
In the langgraph vs langchain comparison, LangChain is ideal when workflows stay simple, and speed matters more than deep control.
Also Read: Difference Between Agentic RAG and Agentic AI
What Is LangGraph and How It Is Used in Real AI Applications
LangGraph is a framework built to handle complex, stateful LLM workflows using a graph-based structure. In the langgraph vs langchain comparison, LangGraph is designed for scenarios where workflows are not linear and require branching, loops, and persistent memory across steps.
Instead of chaining steps one after another, LangGraph lets you define nodes and edges that control how execution moves based on decisions and stored state.
Common real-world use cases
- Agent workflows: Manage agents that plan, act, evaluate results, and adjust behavior over multiple steps.
- Research assistants: Run search, summarization, validation, and refinement in structured stages.
- Validation pipelines: Check outputs, trigger retries, and route failures through defined paths.
- Long-running tasks: Resume workflows that depend on past context or user history.
Also Read: LangGraph Example: Building Multi-Step AI Workflows
Why teams choose LangGraph
- Native state persistence
- Clear and explicit control flow
- Strong support for branching and loops
Where it fits best
Scenario |
Why LangGraph works |
| Production agents | Controlled and predictable logic |
| Multi-step reasoning | Clear decision paths |
| Stateful applications | Context preserved across steps |
| Human-in-the-loop flows | Pauses and approvals supported |
LangGraph is the better choice when workflows move beyond simple chains and require deeper coordination and control.
Also Read: Top 10 Agentic AI Frameworks to Build Intelligent AI Agents in 2026
When to Use LangGraph vs LangChain
Choosing between langgraph vs langchain depends on how complex your AI workflow is and how much control you need over execution.
Use LangChain when
- Tasks follow a clear, linear sequence
- Workflows are short and predictable
- You are building quick prototypes or MVPs
- State does not need to persist across steps
LangChain works well when speed and simplicity matter more than deep control.
Also Read: Agentic AI vs AI Agents
Use LangGraph when
- Workflows involve branching or decision points
- State must persist across multiple steps or sessions
- Agents need retries, planning, or coordination
- Human approvals are part of the workflow
LangGraph is better suited for production systems that need structure, memory, and reliable control flow.
Quick decision guide
Below is the Quick decision guide table for when to use LangGraph vs LangChain :
Requirement |
Better choice |
| Rapid prototyping | LangChain |
| Simple RAG | LangChain |
| Multi-step agents | LangGraph |
| Stateful workflows | LangGraph |
If your system starts to feel fragile or hard to manage, it is often a sign to move from LangChain to LangGraph.
Also Read: Future of Agentic AI
Can LangGraph and LangChain Work Together?
LangGraph and LangChain are often used together in real AI systems. They are designed to complement each other rather than compete.
LangChain usually handles prompts, tools, models, and integrations. LangGraph sits on top and manages control flow, state, and execution logic. In the langgraph vs langchain context, this hybrid setup gives you both speed and structure.
How teams combine them
- LangChain chains run inside LangGraph nodes
- LangGraph controls branching, retries, and loops
- Shared state moves across the workflow
- Execution stays predictable and testable
Also Read: AI Agent vs AI Assistant: What’s the Real Difference?
Why this approach works
- LangChain simplifies integration work
- LangGraph adds safety and control
- Complex logic stays manageable
This combination is common in production systems where workflows start simple but grow into stateful, multi-step processes.
Conclusion
LangGraph vs LangChain is not a competition. It is a design choice. LangChain helps you move fast and build quickly. LangGraph helps you stay in control as systems grow complex.
If you are experimenting, start with LangChain. If you are scaling or shipping to production, LangGraph brings clarity and safety. Understanding when to use each tool is what separates demos from dependable AI systems.
Schedule a free counseling session with upGrad experts today and get personalized guidance to start your Agentic AI journey.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. What is the difference between langgraph vs langchain?
LangChain helps connect prompts, tools, and models in a linear flow. LangGraph focuses on controlling execution using graphs with branching and state. One is suited for simple workflows, while the other handles complex, decision-driven systems with persistence and retries.
2. What is the difference between langgraph and langchain with examples?
A LangChain example is a RAG pipeline that retrieves documents and generates answers in order. A LangGraph example is a research agent that searches, validates, retries, and escalates decisions based on results. The second requires branching and memory.
3. What is the difference between LangChain, LangGraph, and LangSmith?
LangChain builds workflows and integrations. LangGraph controls execution logic and state. LangSmith focuses on tracing, debugging, and evaluating runs. Together, they cover building, controlling, and monitoring LLM applications across development and production environments.
4. Difference between langgraph vs langchain LLM usage?
Both work with the same language models. The difference lies in orchestration. One focuses on sequencing calls to models, while the other manages how and when those calls happen based on decisions, state, and workflow conditions.
5. Is langgraph vs langchain a competition or comparison?
It is a comparison, not a competition. They solve different problems. One helps you build quickly; the other helps you control complexity. Many real systems use both together rather than choosing only one.
6. What problem does LangChain solve?
It simplifies building LLM applications by chaining prompts, tools, and data sources. Developers use it to prototype quickly, connect APIs, and create predictable workflows without worrying about complex execution logic or state management.
7. What problem does LangGraph solve?
It solves control and reliability issues in complex workflows. It allows branching logic, persistent state, retries, and coordination between agents. This makes it suitable for long-running and production-grade systems where execution paths must be explicit.
8. Which is easier to learn for beginners?
LangChain is easier for beginners because it follows a linear flow and has many examples. LangGraph requires thinking in graphs and workflows, which takes more time but pays off when systems become complex.
9. When should you move from LangChain to LangGraph?
You should consider switching when workflows need branching, retries, or memory across steps. If debugging becomes hard or behavior feels unpredictable, adding structured control through a graph-based approach improves reliability.
10. Can LangChain handle complex agent workflows?
It can handle basic agents, but complexity grows quickly. Multi-step planning, validation, and retries become hard to manage. That is where a graph-based execution model provides clearer control and safer behavior.
11. Can LangGraph work without LangChain?
Yes. LangGraph can run standalone workflows. However, many teams still use chains inside graph nodes because it simplifies prompt handling and tool integration while keeping execution logic controlled at a higher level.
12. Which tool is better for RAG pipelines?
Simple retrieval pipelines work well with LangChain. More advanced pipelines that include validation, retries, or multiple retrieval strategies benefit from a graph-based workflow where execution paths change based on results.
13. How does state management differ between the two?
One treats memory as optional and often short-lived. The other treats state as a core concept that flows through every step. This difference matters for long-running or conversational systems.
14. Which is better for production systems?
Graph-based workflows are usually safer in production. Explicit paths, retries, and state to reduce unexpected behavior. Linear chains work well early but often need more structure as systems scale.
15. Are these tools tied to specific LLM providers?
No. Both tools are model agnostic. They work with multiple language model providers. The choice between them affects workflow control, not which model you can use.
16. Do LangGraph workflows increase development time?
Initial setup may take longer, but long-term maintenance becomes easier. Clear execution paths reduce debugging time and unexpected failures, especially as workflows grow larger.
17. Can these tools support human-in-the-loop workflows?
Graph-based workflows support pauses, approvals, and resumable execution more naturally. This makes them better suited for systems where humans review or approve steps before execution continues.
18. Which tool is better for multi-agent systems?
Multi-agent coordination benefits from explicit control and shared state. Managing interactions, retries, and dependencies becomes easier when execution paths are clearly defined instead of inferred at runtime.
19. Do these tools affect model performance?
No. Performance depends on the model itself. These tools only manage orchestration and execution logic. They do not change how language models generate or understand text.
20. Should developers learn both tools?
Yes. Understanding both gives flexibility. One helps you move fast during experimentation, while the other helps you build reliable systems. Knowing when to use each is key to designing scalable AI workflows.
199 articles published
Sriram K is a Senior SEO Executive with a B.Tech in Information Technology from Dr. M.G.R. Educational and Research Institute, Chennai. With over a decade of experience in digital marketing, he specia...
Get Free Consultation
By submitting, I accept the T&C and
Privacy Policy