What Are the Two Types of Text Summarization?
By Sriram
Updated on Feb 26, 2026 | 7 min read | 2.3K+ views
Share:
All courses
Certifications
More
By Sriram
Updated on Feb 26, 2026 | 7 min read | 2.3K+ views
Share:
Table of Contents
The two main types of text summarization in Natural Language Processing (NLP) are extractive and abstractive summarization. Extractive methods identify and pull key sentences directly from the source text, while abstractive methods generate new sentences to paraphrase and condense the main ideas, similar to human summarization.
In this blog, you will understand what are the two types of text summarization, how each works, their differences, and where they are used in real-world NLP systems.
If you want to go beyond the basics of NLP and build real expertise, explore upGrad’s Artificial Intelligence courses and gain hands-on skills from experts today!
Popular AI Programs
To understand what are the two types of text summarization, let’s break down both approaches clearly. Below, we will explain how extractive and abstractive summarization work and how they differ in practice.
These two approaches differ mainly in how the final summary is created and how much the original wording is changed.
Also Read: Natural Language Processing in Machine Learning: Complete Guide
Here is a quick comparison:
| Type | How It Works | Output Style |
| Extractive | Selects important sentences from original text | Uses original wording |
| Abstractive | Generates new sentences based on meaning | Rewritten summary |
Both approaches aim to shorten long content while preserving key information.
The core difference lies in whether the system copies text directly or generates new phrasing based on understanding.
Also Read: Text Summarization in NLP: Key Concepts, Techniques and Implementation
Extractive summarization is the older and simpler method. This approach acts like a human using a highlighter on a textbook. The machine scans the original document and identifies the most important sentences based on specific keywords. It then pulls those exact sentences out to create the final paragraph.
The algorithm scores every sentence mathematically. It looks for word frequency and sentence position. Sentences with the highest scores are selected.
Also Read: Text Classification in NLP: From Basics to Advanced Techniques
Original text:
“The company launched a new product. The launch event was held in Mumbai. The product received positive reviews.”
Extractive summary:
“The company launched a new product. The product received positive reviews.”
The system copies original sentences without rewriting them.
Also Read: Types of Natural Language Processing with Examples
Machine Learning Courses to upskill
Explore Machine Learning Courses for Career Progression
Abstractive summarization is the modern approach powered by advanced neural networks. Instead of copying exact phrases, this method actually understands the core context. It reads the whole document and then writes a completely new summary using entirely different vocabulary. This mimics how a human writer would summarize a book.
This method requires massive computing power. It uses deep learning models to generate natural human language.
Also Read: NLP in Deep Learning: Models, Methods, and Applications
Original text:
“The company launched a new product. The product received positive reviews.”
Abstractive summary:
“The new product launch was well received.”
The model creates a new sentence while preserving meaning.
Also Read: Which NLP Model Is Best for Sentiment Analysis in 2026?
Choosing the right method depends on your project goals. Extractive tools are fast and reliable. Abstractive tools are highly advanced but can sometimes generate false facts. Understanding these differences helps developers build better software.
| Feature | Extractive Method | Abstractive Method |
| Output Type | Copied original text | Brand new sentences |
| Complexity | Very low | Very high |
| Hardware Needs | Basic processors | Advanced GPU hardware |
Also Read: NLP Models in Machine Learning and Deep Learning
Artificial intelligence changes how we read daily. If a colleague ever asks you what are the two types of text summarization, you can now explain extraction and abstraction confidently. Extractive methods highlight existing facts, while abstractive methods create fresh overviews. Knowing how both function allows you to choose the perfect natural language processing tool for your next big project.
"Want personalized guidance on AI and upskilling opportunities? Connect with upGrad’s experts for a free 1:1 counselling session today!"
The two primary types are extractive summarization and abstractive summarization. Extractive models select and copy the most important sentences from a document. Abstractive models read the text and generate a brand new summary using original words.
Extractive summarization is much easier to build and deploy. It relies on simple mathematical scoring to rank sentence importance. You do not need massive datasets or expensive servers to create a basic extractive tool.
Abstractive models must understand deep context and generate natural language from scratch. This requires complex neural networks and massive amounts of memory. Processing these deep learning algorithms demands highly advanced hardware setups.
Yes, extractive methods can sometimes trigger plagiarism detectors. Because the algorithm copies exact sentences from the source material, the output is not original. You must properly cite the original document when using this specific approach.
Machines count how many priority keywords appear in a single sentence. Sentences containing the main subject words receive the highest mathematical scores. The system then selects the top scoring phrases to form the final text.
Yes, these text processing techniques apply to almost every major spoken language. The core mathematical logic remains exactly the same. You simply need a different dictionary database to process non-English text documents.
The biggest disadvantage is the risk of generating false information. Sometimes the neural network misunderstands the context and writes a summary that is factually incorrect. This phenomenon is commonly known as an artificial intelligence hallucination.
Abstractive summarization produces a much more natural and humanized reading experience. It smooths out transitions and uses varied vocabulary to keep the reader engaged. Extractive summaries can sometimes feel disconnected and slightly robotic.
Many open source programming libraries help developers build these tools for free. Python offers excellent packages specifically designed for natural language processing tasks. These free tools handle the heavy lifting of data cleaning automatically.
Preprocessing cleans the raw data before the machine reads it. It removes useless punctuation and common filler words that confuse the algorithm. This ensures the machine only analyzes words that carry actual semantic value.
Yes, many advanced systems combine both approaches to achieve the best results. The system first extracts the most important sentences to narrow down the data. Then, an abstractive model rewrites those specific sentences into a flowing paragraph.
265 articles published
Sriram K is a Senior SEO Executive with a B.Tech in Information Technology from Dr. M.G.R. Educational and Research Institute, Chennai. With over a decade of experience in digital marketing, he specia...
Speak with AI & ML expert
By submitting, I accept the T&C and
Privacy Policy
Top Resources